Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Mazda RX8 vs. Audi TT vs. Nissan 350 Z vs. Chrysler Crossfire

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-09-2003, 07:12 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
kidmarc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mazda RX8 vs. Audi TT vs. Nissan 350 Z vs. Chrysler Crossfire

Germany --

Kabel 1, Abenteuer Auto

The Mazda RX-8 places second to the Audi TT -- problem with tires breaking loose, especially in wet (same as spoken about in the Top Gear video).

Scroll down to Video zum Vergleich, choose your speed (DSL, Modem), and hit the play button (arrow) after window changes. [Real Video]

Peace
marcus
Old 12-09-2003, 04:50 PM
  #2  
Registered Lunatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Tamas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 3,575
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
Ah well... this was expectable - after all, the Germans will sure have a soft spot for their beloved Audi :p
Just kidding... the TT is a great car- but I'm wondering how all those handling-tests would look if the RX-8 had all-wheel-drive as well. Not sure if the Audi would come out on top then :D
It was interesting that on the wet circle, the Crossfire was judged to be better than the RX-8 - that's a surprise for sure.
Old 12-09-2003, 04:57 PM
  #3  
JRizzle
 
RX8FanMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Burlington, NC
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is it a video? because i try watching it, and it will just be like a shot (a picture) of the car and you would hear sound. Is it suppose to do this or what?
Old 12-09-2003, 05:00 PM
  #4  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
you probaly need a new codec
Old 12-09-2003, 06:15 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
rxeighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: WV
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry

The TT is an expensive Beetle. I've driven it on a road coarse, and I wasn't impressed. Kind of like sitting in a bathtub, lots of understeer, and turbo lag. There are a lot of cars out there that handle better, and IMO, the RX-8 does.
Old 12-09-2003, 07:38 PM
  #6  
Registered Lunatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Tamas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 3,575
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
Well, the one they had in this test is a V6 and if I'm not mistaken, naturally aspirated instead of turbo. The understeer is probably greatly reduced by the all-wheel-drive. Was the one you drove a quattro too, or just the base, plain-jane turbo 2WD version? That would make a huge difference and the RX-8 will certainly handle and perform better than the 1.8 turbo 2WD Audi TT.
Old 12-09-2003, 07:51 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
rxeighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: WV
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
225hp quattro. I haven't driven the V6, but they say its better.
Old 12-09-2003, 09:47 PM
  #8  
Goh Mifune
 
MEGAREDS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Green Oaks, IL
Posts: 850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sound is good, video is like watching a slide show. Others are seeing smooth video?
Old 12-09-2003, 10:05 PM
  #9  
Registered Lunatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Tamas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 3,575
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
Yep.
Get a new computer or a faster connection :p
Old 12-10-2003, 07:46 AM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
kidmarc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tamas Yep.
Get a new computer or a faster connection :p
That's cold...

Anyways... the RX-8's tires are twitching in the wet. If that were not the case, it would have made a strong showing for 1st. The TT is too costly for its feature set. [Currently price has become a major factor in Germany.] While the reviewers have a soft spot for Audi, they also have one for the late Dr. Felix Wankel. They did have a celebration for his 100th birthday last year.

As for the video... the streaming is at approx. 75 Kbps - 128 Kbps and upward on the Modem/ISDN side. Check your speed or internet routing for hang-ups.

Peace
marcus
Old 02-08-2004, 10:56 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Xlorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Plano, Tx
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A good codec pack if anyone needs:

Windows Codec Pack (for all versions of windows)

May want to read up on how to uninstall any previous codecs, the pack above should fit all your codec needs.
Old 02-08-2004, 11:02 PM
  #12  
I got nothing good to say
 
DemonRX-8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tysons Corner, VA
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Will this codec pack help with Quick Time videos? I have cable modem and WMP video's download very well, but Quick Time videos are butt slow to download.
Old 02-08-2004, 11:55 PM
  #13  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This may as well have been a tire comparison. I hate when publications do performance tests (especially when the conditions are less than ideal) and don't have a control tire. Tamas, understeer is usually a product of AWD, so who knows what rxeightr drove until he tells us. But I will say I've driven both of the turbo TTs and they were very unimpressive to me from a driving standpoint. Nice cars, but more fluff than performance IMO.
Old 02-09-2004, 10:18 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Xlorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Plano, Tx
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by DemonRX-8
Will this codec pack help with Quick Time videos? I have cable modem and WMP video's download very well, but Quick Time videos are butt slow to download.
This may not solve your problem, but would be a good place to start. I would remove all codecs and free players, real player, quicktime etc.. You remove codecs through the device manager on most versions of Windows that I'm aware of. As a last step you may want to boot into Windows in safe mode, check the device manager again for codecs and remove any you find.

Install the codecs, check for Windows media player updates at www.microsoftupdates.com, install minimal versions (and be sure to choose "custom" installation for Real Player and Quicktime. Have Realplayer only play real player audio, and Quicktime only view quicktime movies. Keep an eye out for having the player automatically start with windows, you don't want it to. Check for driver updates for your Video and Audio card if you haven't in a while. Update Direct X if you have the bandwidth and aren't current.

Install Ad-aware (ad-aware)

Install Spybot Search and destroy Spybot Search Destroy Be sure to scan and "immunize" with this program.

Check registry for programs starting up. Start-->Run, Type "regedit" Win2k/XP/NT look here:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE, Software, Microsoft, Windows, Current Version, RUN. These keys list the programs that start up with Windows automatically. You can do searches on Google for suspicous files. Delete the keys (in the right pane) that you don't want starting up.

Do all that on most computers and performance will improve in substantial ways. Hope it helps your video problem. Quicktime movies load as fast as others for me and I'm on cable as well.

Good Luck.

Last edited by Xlorn; 02-09-2004 at 10:21 AM.
Old 02-09-2004, 03:02 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
FamilyGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you head over to edmunds.com, they did a review recently on the new TT. They also didn't like the previous one but are quite impressed with the new one.

So maybe the 3.2 V6 with AWD and a few upgrades really is a lot better. Or maybe they're just prejudiced in favor of the home team :D
Old 02-09-2004, 03:23 PM
  #16  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by FamilyGuy
If you head over to edmunds.com, they did a review recently on the new TT. They also didn't like the previous one but are quite impressed with the new one.

So maybe the 3.2 V6 with AWD and a few upgrades really is a lot better. Or maybe they're just prejudiced in favor of the home team :D
They must have done some serious suspension work, because the turbo models handled like snot.
Old 02-09-2004, 03:23 PM
  #17  
adkdai8e dkadloi98
 
zerobanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OMG, they picked a beetle over the rx-8, amazing. I dont put credibility in any magazine that doesn't rank the rx-8 #1.
Old 02-09-2004, 04:41 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
FamilyGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by zerobanger
OMG, they picked a beetle over the rx-8, amazing. I dont put credibility in any magazine that doesn't rank the rx-8 #1.
Be serious now. If everyone said "I don't give credibility to any magazine except for one that says that my favorite car is the best" there would be no point to making or reading magazines, would there?

But I do have to agree... the 350Z and RX8 are both faster and better handling, so unless the writeup was called "entry level boulevard cruiser with soft handling comparison test" I don't see how the TT (or the Crossfire, for that matter) could have come even close.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dweezil22
NE For Sale/Wanted
12
09-09-2015 10:50 AM
akagc
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
08-11-2015 07:07 PM
TheAlbinoRhino
New Member Forum
0
08-04-2015 09:48 PM
Rx8Lovin
New Member Forum
4
07-25-2015 08:39 PM
AussieGray
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
0
07-16-2015 03:58 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Mazda RX8 vs. Audi TT vs. Nissan 350 Z vs. Chrysler Crossfire



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:45 PM.