Mazda to push Skyactiv Turbo to more vehicles
05-24-2017, 11:43 AM
#26
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sheboygan Falls, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Cayman is probably the route I'm gonna end up going as well. I'm a couple years away from buying anyway so I'll be able to see what happens with the Supra and see if the Z ever gets a refresh. It's probably a safe bet to give up on Mazda for any high performance at this point.
06-01-2017, 05:40 PM
#27
Registered
Cayman is probably the route I'm gonna end up going as well. I'm a couple years away from buying anyway so I'll be able to see what happens with the Supra and see if the Z ever gets a refresh. It's probably a safe bet to give up on Mazda for any high performance at this point.
06-01-2017, 09:14 PM
#28
Rockie Mountain Newbie
I have no idea what might be available in the future, but I hope it's going to be epic.
BC.
06-02-2017, 08:57 AM
#29
Registered
06-02-2017, 11:11 AM
#30
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
hi, I'm here for the Cayman owner's club...err.... wait...
06-03-2017, 10:43 AM
#33
Rockie Mountain Newbie
Honestly, I wish I could have both cars at the exact same time.
I would rather Mazda step up its damn game and make a replacement for the RX-8 with everything we want as Mazda fans.
The RX-8 is a lighter feeling car at the steering wheel and controls compared to the Cayman, even though their weights are nearly identical. The Cayman feels more stable on mid corner bumps because of all the weight behind the seats, of course. Both cars are lightning fast when pitching through esses and tight corners, and are rock stable in those weight transitions.
Mazda wins for interior room, and ability to lean back and relax, or to carry passengers (no duh, I know), but the Cayman wins for being able to drive from Denver to Detroit to Maine, and then back without bankrupting you in gas and oil purchases. We had our car for just a couple of weeks and had put 2k miles on it before our 5500 mile journey with the Cayman to my mom's 70th b-day party in New Brunswick, Canada.
Both cars are stunning to look at, and I never get tired of looking at either one.
I always keep my eyes out for RX-8's while driving, and miss mine.
But, when the road is open in front of me, and I get to open up the Cayman to 7500 rpms, with that engine howling just behind my back, I'm not missing the RX-8 all that much.
It may be silly for you, but it's not for me.
It was the direction I was planning to go as I owned the RX-8 (unless Mazda released something in the time frame that I was ready to make a purchase), and it was just a matter of time before I bought it. That damned sexy CX-5, however, delayed that plan by 2 years.
Also, my Cayman is a Base, so 231 hp vs 275 with nearly the same weight is a good progression in life. Perfectly fine comparison to make, in my opinion. All the sporting options are checked (MT, PASM, PTV w/LSD), without any of the fluff (except the 14 way memory leather seats option since my wife and I are on different height spectrums, and for the adaptive xenon headlights).
I love the Cayman, and I don't sit in it, thinking I wish it had a bit more power, or more torque, or got better fuel mileage, or that it has a less squeaky interior. That car is a gem, and you get exactly what you pay for with the money you put down - an expertly built canyon carving no compromises sports car that sounds and looks as good as it drives.
And I daily drive the hell out of it.
Over 30k miles in the 2 years I've owned it so far.
BC.
I would rather Mazda step up its damn game and make a replacement for the RX-8 with everything we want as Mazda fans.
The RX-8 is a lighter feeling car at the steering wheel and controls compared to the Cayman, even though their weights are nearly identical. The Cayman feels more stable on mid corner bumps because of all the weight behind the seats, of course. Both cars are lightning fast when pitching through esses and tight corners, and are rock stable in those weight transitions.
Mazda wins for interior room, and ability to lean back and relax, or to carry passengers (no duh, I know), but the Cayman wins for being able to drive from Denver to Detroit to Maine, and then back without bankrupting you in gas and oil purchases. We had our car for just a couple of weeks and had put 2k miles on it before our 5500 mile journey with the Cayman to my mom's 70th b-day party in New Brunswick, Canada.
Both cars are stunning to look at, and I never get tired of looking at either one.
I always keep my eyes out for RX-8's while driving, and miss mine.
But, when the road is open in front of me, and I get to open up the Cayman to 7500 rpms, with that engine howling just behind my back, I'm not missing the RX-8 all that much.
It was the direction I was planning to go as I owned the RX-8 (unless Mazda released something in the time frame that I was ready to make a purchase), and it was just a matter of time before I bought it. That damned sexy CX-5, however, delayed that plan by 2 years.
Also, my Cayman is a Base, so 231 hp vs 275 with nearly the same weight is a good progression in life. Perfectly fine comparison to make, in my opinion. All the sporting options are checked (MT, PASM, PTV w/LSD), without any of the fluff (except the 14 way memory leather seats option since my wife and I are on different height spectrums, and for the adaptive xenon headlights).
I love the Cayman, and I don't sit in it, thinking I wish it had a bit more power, or more torque, or got better fuel mileage, or that it has a less squeaky interior. That car is a gem, and you get exactly what you pay for with the money you put down - an expertly built canyon carving no compromises sports car that sounds and looks as good as it drives.
And I daily drive the hell out of it.
Over 30k miles in the 2 years I've owned it so far.
BC.
06-13-2017, 12:47 PM
#37
Honestly, I wish I could have both cars at the exact same time.
I would rather Mazda step up its damn game and make a replacement for the RX-8 with everything we want as Mazda fans.
The RX-8 is a lighter feeling car at the steering wheel and controls compared to the Cayman, even though their weights are nearly identical. The Cayman feels more stable on mid corner bumps because of all the weight behind the seats, of course. Both cars are lightning fast when pitching through esses and tight corners, and are rock stable in those weight transitions.
Mazda wins for interior room, and ability to lean back and relax, or to carry passengers (no duh, I know), but the Cayman wins for being able to drive from Denver to Detroit to Maine, and then back without bankrupting you in gas and oil purchases. We had our car for just a couple of weeks and had put 2k miles on it before our 5500 mile journey with the Cayman to my mom's 70th b-day party in New Brunswick, Canada.
Both cars are stunning to look at, and I never get tired of looking at either one.
I always keep my eyes out for RX-8's while driving, and miss mine.
But, when the road is open in front of me, and I get to open up the Cayman to 7500 rpms, with that engine howling just behind my back, I'm not missing the RX-8 all that much.
It may be silly for you, but it's not for me.
It was the direction I was planning to go as I owned the RX-8 (unless Mazda released something in the time frame that I was ready to make a purchase), and it was just a matter of time before I bought it. That damned sexy CX-5, however, delayed that plan by 2 years.
Also, my Cayman is a Base, so 231 hp vs 275 with nearly the same weight is a good progression in life. Perfectly fine comparison to make, in my opinion. All the sporting options are checked (MT, PASM, PTV w/LSD), without any of the fluff (except the 14 way memory leather seats option since my wife and I are on different height spectrums, and for the adaptive xenon headlights).
I love the Cayman, and I don't sit in it, thinking I wish it had a bit more power, or more torque, or got better fuel mileage, or that it has a less squeaky interior. That car is a gem, and you get exactly what you pay for with the money you put down - an expertly built canyon carving no compromises sports car that sounds and looks as good as it drives.
And I daily drive the hell out of it.
Over 30k miles in the 2 years I've owned it so far.
BC.
I would rather Mazda step up its damn game and make a replacement for the RX-8 with everything we want as Mazda fans.
The RX-8 is a lighter feeling car at the steering wheel and controls compared to the Cayman, even though their weights are nearly identical. The Cayman feels more stable on mid corner bumps because of all the weight behind the seats, of course. Both cars are lightning fast when pitching through esses and tight corners, and are rock stable in those weight transitions.
Mazda wins for interior room, and ability to lean back and relax, or to carry passengers (no duh, I know), but the Cayman wins for being able to drive from Denver to Detroit to Maine, and then back without bankrupting you in gas and oil purchases. We had our car for just a couple of weeks and had put 2k miles on it before our 5500 mile journey with the Cayman to my mom's 70th b-day party in New Brunswick, Canada.
Both cars are stunning to look at, and I never get tired of looking at either one.
I always keep my eyes out for RX-8's while driving, and miss mine.
But, when the road is open in front of me, and I get to open up the Cayman to 7500 rpms, with that engine howling just behind my back, I'm not missing the RX-8 all that much.
It may be silly for you, but it's not for me.
It was the direction I was planning to go as I owned the RX-8 (unless Mazda released something in the time frame that I was ready to make a purchase), and it was just a matter of time before I bought it. That damned sexy CX-5, however, delayed that plan by 2 years.
Also, my Cayman is a Base, so 231 hp vs 275 with nearly the same weight is a good progression in life. Perfectly fine comparison to make, in my opinion. All the sporting options are checked (MT, PASM, PTV w/LSD), without any of the fluff (except the 14 way memory leather seats option since my wife and I are on different height spectrums, and for the adaptive xenon headlights).
I love the Cayman, and I don't sit in it, thinking I wish it had a bit more power, or more torque, or got better fuel mileage, or that it has a less squeaky interior. That car is a gem, and you get exactly what you pay for with the money you put down - an expertly built canyon carving no compromises sports car that sounds and looks as good as it drives.
And I daily drive the hell out of it.
Over 30k miles in the 2 years I've owned it so far.
BC.
06-13-2017, 01:03 PM
#38
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
Honestly, I wish I could have both cars at the exact same time.
I would rather Mazda step up its damn game and make a replacement for the RX-8 with everything we want as Mazda fans.
The RX-8 is a lighter feeling car at the steering wheel and controls compared to the Cayman, even though their weights are nearly identical. The Cayman feels more stable on mid corner bumps because of all the weight behind the seats, of course. Both cars are lightning fast when pitching through esses and tight corners, and are rock stable in those weight transitions.
Mazda wins for interior room, and ability to lean back and relax, or to carry passengers (no duh, I know), but the Cayman wins for being able to drive from Denver to Detroit to Maine, and then back without bankrupting you in gas and oil purchases. We had our car for just a couple of weeks and had put 2k miles on it before our 5500 mile journey with the Cayman to my mom's 70th b-day party in New Brunswick, Canada.
Both cars are stunning to look at, and I never get tired of looking at either one.
I always keep my eyes out for RX-8's while driving, and miss mine.
But, when the road is open in front of me, and I get to open up the Cayman to 7500 rpms, with that engine howling just behind my back, I'm not missing the RX-8 all that much.
It may be silly for you, but it's not for me.
It was the direction I was planning to go as I owned the RX-8 (unless Mazda released something in the time frame that I was ready to make a purchase), and it was just a matter of time before I bought it. That damned sexy CX-5, however, delayed that plan by 2 years.
Also, my Cayman is a Base, so 231 hp vs 275 with nearly the same weight is a good progression in life. Perfectly fine comparison to make, in my opinion. All the sporting options are checked (MT, PASM, PTV w/LSD), without any of the fluff (except the 14 way memory leather seats option since my wife and I are on different height spectrums, and for the adaptive xenon headlights).
I love the Cayman, and I don't sit in it, thinking I wish it had a bit more power, or more torque, or got better fuel mileage, or that it has a less squeaky interior. That car is a gem, and you get exactly what you pay for with the money you put down - an expertly built canyon carving no compromises sports car that sounds and looks as good as it drives.
And I daily drive the hell out of it.
Over 30k miles in the 2 years I've owned it so far.
BC.
I would rather Mazda step up its damn game and make a replacement for the RX-8 with everything we want as Mazda fans.
The RX-8 is a lighter feeling car at the steering wheel and controls compared to the Cayman, even though their weights are nearly identical. The Cayman feels more stable on mid corner bumps because of all the weight behind the seats, of course. Both cars are lightning fast when pitching through esses and tight corners, and are rock stable in those weight transitions.
Mazda wins for interior room, and ability to lean back and relax, or to carry passengers (no duh, I know), but the Cayman wins for being able to drive from Denver to Detroit to Maine, and then back without bankrupting you in gas and oil purchases. We had our car for just a couple of weeks and had put 2k miles on it before our 5500 mile journey with the Cayman to my mom's 70th b-day party in New Brunswick, Canada.
Both cars are stunning to look at, and I never get tired of looking at either one.
I always keep my eyes out for RX-8's while driving, and miss mine.
But, when the road is open in front of me, and I get to open up the Cayman to 7500 rpms, with that engine howling just behind my back, I'm not missing the RX-8 all that much.
It may be silly for you, but it's not for me.
It was the direction I was planning to go as I owned the RX-8 (unless Mazda released something in the time frame that I was ready to make a purchase), and it was just a matter of time before I bought it. That damned sexy CX-5, however, delayed that plan by 2 years.
Also, my Cayman is a Base, so 231 hp vs 275 with nearly the same weight is a good progression in life. Perfectly fine comparison to make, in my opinion. All the sporting options are checked (MT, PASM, PTV w/LSD), without any of the fluff (except the 14 way memory leather seats option since my wife and I are on different height spectrums, and for the adaptive xenon headlights).
I love the Cayman, and I don't sit in it, thinking I wish it had a bit more power, or more torque, or got better fuel mileage, or that it has a less squeaky interior. That car is a gem, and you get exactly what you pay for with the money you put down - an expertly built canyon carving no compromises sports car that sounds and looks as good as it drives.
And I daily drive the hell out of it.
Over 30k miles in the 2 years I've owned it so far.
BC.
I have not driven a base, but the GTS I looked at was wonderful, no comparison to an RX-8 in anyway IMO and that is as it should be since you can buy an RX-8 for $10.00 now days.
06-13-2017, 08:23 PM
#39
Smoking turbo yay
That's gonna become more and more common. A lot of other manufacturers are using turbos now on family cars.
Honda, for example, is already using a 1.5 I4T for the new Civics on the higher trims. Words have it that the new 2018 Accords will ditch the 3.5 V6 for a 2.0 I4T.
Turbos are not necessarily a bad thing, but an I4T doesn't exactly have the same smoothness as a V6, so a lot of people still prefer a NA V6 setup.
Honda, for example, is already using a 1.5 I4T for the new Civics on the higher trims. Words have it that the new 2018 Accords will ditch the 3.5 V6 for a 2.0 I4T.
Turbos are not necessarily a bad thing, but an I4T doesn't exactly have the same smoothness as a V6, so a lot of people still prefer a NA V6 setup.
06-14-2017, 10:15 AM
#41
The one car in their rwd platform is the least likely to receive Turbo Skyactiv anything, for now at least. MX-5 is still about 'balance' and lightweight is a very important part of that equation.
Paul.
Paul.
The following 2 users liked this post by Mazmart:
Jedi54 (06-16-2017),
WaitingforFI (06-16-2017)
06-19-2017, 02:26 PM
#44
.I think Mazda 6 is the obvious candidate.
Paul.
The following users liked this post:
Jedi54 (06-21-2017)
The following users liked this post:
Jedi54 (06-21-2017)
06-20-2017, 05:57 PM
#47
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
I read the Stinger was going to be close to 50k, that is just nuts for a KIA. Even the most expensive Accord (fully loaded hybrid) is not expected to be over 40k. My buddies fully loaded 6 GT was just over 30k so if they added the turbo engine and don't increase the price much they could have a winner.
06-21-2017, 11:53 AM
#50
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
Turbo SA-G in the Mazda 6 with optional AWD.
winning!
winning!
The following users liked this post:
zoom44 (06-22-2017)