RX8Club.com

RX8Club.com (https://www.rx8club.com/)
-   General Automotive (https://www.rx8club.com/general-automotive-49/)
-   -   I'm surprised...no discussion (https://www.rx8club.com/general-automotive-49/im-surprised-no-discussion-257019/)

TALAN7 02-09-2015 06:10 PM

I'm surprised...no discussion
 
Ford is about to make history here in the US with the focus RS

Ford Focus RS Revealed with 315+ HP, All-Wheel Drive

Ford Focus RS Revealed with 315+ HP, All-Wheel Drive

Awd and over 315 hp, in a small, relatively lightweight car. Sounds like a winner to me. I can see the battle now, STI vs Golf R vs Focus RS vs Civic type r (wait, it's not coming to US, scratch Civic) vs (Mazdaspeed 3?). My only problem is it's based off a 4 door ecobox. It looks badass, but a little too young for my tastes. Now if only Ford would make a sexy 2 door coupe and call it the Probe, then I'd be all over it.

RIWWP 02-09-2015 06:15 PM

What's there to talk about?


The only point of interest I see is that it fills the hole left by the outgoing Evo: A mid $30ks turbocharged AWD sedan based on an econobox to compete with the STI.

Other than that. Shrug. There are other cars that I'd be more likely to buy so it isn't even on my radar.

J8635621 02-09-2015 06:25 PM

I'm surprised someone would admit to being excited about a new probe

TeamRX8 02-10-2015 01:27 AM


Originally Posted by TALAN7 (Post 4663218)
relatively lightweight car.

I'm not surprisd that someone would make such a claim when no weight information has been released yet.

TALAN7 02-10-2015 06:41 AM


Originally Posted by J8635621 (Post 4663224)
I'm surprised someone would admit to being excited about a new probe

If it was a lightweight, sexy, two door coupe with awd and over 315 turbo hp, I'd be all over it.

Signal 2 02-10-2015 08:20 AM

^It would probably get a lot of attention from current and potential BRZ buyers. And they could call it whatever they like.

BigCajun 02-10-2015 09:00 AM

Anyone remember the EXP?
That was supposed to be the 'new Thunderbird'.
Looked like a frog.:)

LiveWire 02-10-2015 09:02 AM

I think awd and lightweight are difficult to package together

thewatcher101 02-10-2015 12:18 PM

As the GTR should have taught us, that weight is not an issue, as long as the weight is balance along with awd's grip and power to exit corners. It should be a formula for an awesome car.

LiveWire 02-11-2015 04:46 PM

But that GTR is also super expensive. I don't mean to say that the two are exclusive, but I doubt it will be lighter than an Rx8 which is the chunkiest of the Rx series. However, the turbo awd platform has proven strong in power, practicality, and handling too. So yes it will likely be a good vehicle, but just as our Verbose Supermod said, you can expect it to be like the STI and Evo.

9krpmrx8 02-11-2015 04:56 PM

Remember when 3000lbs+ for a sports car was heavy? Everyone should drive a Lotus to be reminded of what a true sports car feels like.

TALAN7 02-12-2015 10:30 AM

lightweight is relative. If the average weight of cars is 3800 lbs, then 3300 lbs would be seen as lightweight. If the average weight goes up to 4100 lbs, then 3700 lbs would be seen as lightweight. Cars have been getting heavier over the decades. I think it's hit its peak as most manufacturers now realize to hit mpg goals, they have to start reigning in weight.

9krpmrx8 02-12-2015 10:35 AM

Light weight is light weight, heavy is heavy.

If you have a hot skinny chick who is 110lbs and a chick who is 250lbs, and another chick who is 400lbs, then you still have one skinny chick, and two fat chicks. Even though there is a 150lb difference between the two fat chicks.

RIWWP 02-12-2015 11:50 AM

And regardless of what kind of method each chick is using to get around



https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rx8...c25f09828c.png

https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rx8...6a5c8a72c9.jpg

https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rx8...5978d898f7.jpg



I mean, I know which one I prefer. Maybe your preference is different.

J8635621 02-12-2015 11:52 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Hard to beat the classics

TALAN7 02-12-2015 12:25 PM


Originally Posted by RIWWP (Post 4663955)
And regardless of what kind of method each chick is using to get around



https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rx8...c25f09828c.png

https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rx8...6a5c8a72c9.jpg

http://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rx8c...5978d898f7.jpg

I mean, I know which one I prefer. Maybe your preference is different.

Your methodology is flawed. When referring to people there are government and medically established guidelines regarding when one is considered overweight or obese. Also, people can gain or lose weight, cars can't. Cars are different. The weight of cars has gone up over the years as technology has advanced. The average car from 20 years ago would be considered light by todays standards. What governmental guideline says when a car is considered heavy?

J8635621 02-12-2015 12:27 PM

You need the government to tell you when someone is fat? Lol

200.mph 02-12-2015 02:00 PM

j we need the gov to tell us everything and make our decisions for us

yhea pearl we know know which one you want lol

RIWWP 02-12-2015 06:10 PM


Originally Posted by TALAN7 (Post 4663987)
Your methodology is flawed. When referring to people there are government and medically established guidelines regarding when one is considered overweight or obese. Also, people can gain or lose weight, cars can't. Cars are different. The weight of cars has gone up over the years as technology has advanced. The average car from 20 years ago would be considered light by todays standards. What governmental guideline says when a car is considered heavy?

Wait... what? cars can't lose weight?

Aside from the obvious weight reduction mods, they can indeed lose weight. The first example that comes to mind is the 2016 Miata losing 220lbs over the 2015 Miata. Another is the 981 Boxster/Cayman, lost 77lbs over the 987.

There are plenty more examples. Just because people stuff their faces and get fat doesn't mean that they have to. Just because US car manufacturers don't mind getting their cars fat doesn't mean that they have to.

You think the GTR is great at 4,000lbs? Imagine what it would have been at 3,000lbs. Weight is a penalty. Weight is NOT a non-factor.

LiveWire 02-12-2015 09:55 PM

We should even extend that thought a bit. If two cars have the same power to weight ratio, all else but weight the same, the lighter one is better.

TALAN7 02-13-2015 10:00 AM


Originally Posted by RIWWP (Post 4664061)
Wait... what? cars can't lose weight?

Aside from the obvious weight reduction mods, they can indeed lose weight. The first example that comes to mind is the 2016 Miata losing 220lbs over the 2015 Miata. Another is the 981 Boxster/Cayman, lost 77lbs over the 987.

There are plenty more examples. Just because people stuff their faces and get fat doesn't mean that they have to. Just because US car manufacturers don't mind getting their cars fat doesn't mean that they have to.

You think the GTR is great at 4,000lbs? Imagine what it would have been at 3,000lbs. Weight is a penalty. Weight is NOT a non-factor.

You're right, cars can lose weight, albeit not on their own. I was saying that the methodology comparing people to cars was flawed. Yes, the argument mentioned 1 skinny girl and 2 fat girls. You take a 2000 lb lotus, a 3000 lb RX8 and a 4000 lb GTR. I don't think many people would say the RX8 is heavy at 3000 lbs, in fact in every review I read they mentioned it was light. You could say it's heavy compared to the lotus. You could also say it was light compared to the GTR. In that regards I'm saying lightweight is relative. Regardless, all 3 cars handle extremely well so technology can overcome weight issues if applied correctly. And also, in my comment regarding a new Probe I mentioned that it should be lightweight.

Do you think the GTR is not great because it's 4000 lbs?

RIWWP 02-13-2015 01:30 PM


Originally Posted by TALAN7 (Post 4664196)
Do you think the GTR is not great because it's 4000 lbs?

In my opinion actually, yes. The GTR would be intersting to me if it was 3,000lbs. Perhaps more than interesting at 2,500lbs. At 4,000lbs it is just a fat pig and I literally have zero interest in it. They pass my vision regularly even, and I don't even bother looking. Equal footing with a Corolla to me. Don't care one bit.

9krpmrx8 02-13-2015 01:50 PM

The RX-8 is fat compared to a Lotus. My example is perfect. The lotus is the aspiring model/cheerleader, the RX-8 would be the sexy pretty/athletic but chunky chick (think volley ball players), and the GTR would be the Fat girl who can perform like a porn star.

Example:

hot chick on the left.


https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rx8...bdb2c5b997.jpg


https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rx8...4d9be5a5f0.jpg

SayNoToPistons 02-19-2015 10:58 AM

Every manufacturer needs to take a look at the ND Miata.

LiveWire 02-19-2015 11:15 AM

In the GTR35s defense, Nissan never aimed for any of the GTR series to be super lightweight. Other models like the GTR34 were not light compared to other cars at the time either. But, IMO 4000 lbs is far heavier than it needs to be.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:18 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands