RX8Club.com

RX8Club.com (https://www.rx8club.com/)
-   General Automotive (https://www.rx8club.com/general-automotive-49/)
-   -   2010 Camaro (https://www.rx8club.com/general-automotive-49/2010-camaro-155560/)

PotatoSoup 02-17-2009 02:08 PM

Who in hell cares?

Cars like the Camaro and Challenger are just big, stupid, heavy, go fast in a straight line, and that's it. Zero finesse.

If you want American muscle, buy a Mustang and get a FI setup. Or buy a ZR1 if you have the cash. That's a proper sports car.

Gauge 02-17-2009 02:43 PM

Nothing wrong with straight line speed...unless you live in the mountains lol

NightmareX 02-17-2009 03:06 PM

Its coming theres no doubt about it.

PotatoSoup 02-17-2009 03:16 PM


Originally Posted by Gauge (Post 2871864)
Nothing wrong with straight line speed...unless you live in the mountains lol

Nobody said there was anything wrong with straight-line speed. But when straight-line speed is the ONLY thing a car has going for it...fail.

devildog1679 02-17-2009 03:23 PM


Originally Posted by PotatoSoup (Post 2871805)
Who in hell cares?

Cars like the Camaro and Challenger are just big, stupid, heavy, go fast in a straight line, and that's it. Zero finesse.

If you want American muscle, buy a Mustang and get a FI setup. Or buy a ZR1 if you have the cash. That's a proper sports car.

Big- Yes
Stupid- How so?
Heavy- Yes, but it has the power to haul it.
Staright line Speed- Hell Yes

What's wrong with straight line speed if the handling is pretty decent. Just because a car is heavy doesn't mean it handles like a boat. Now can it handle as well as a RX-8, hell no, but who cares. It will provide the same kind of rush I got whenever I took an on ramp at crazy speeds. Though this will come in the form of neck snapping torque The Camaro is more then just about looks and speed, it's about the legacy of the badge.


Originally Posted by PotatoSoup (Post 2871918)
Nobody said there was anything wrong with straight-line speed. But when straight-line speed is the ONLY thing a car has going for it...fail.

I guess they already road tested the SS:icon_no2: How about you wait for the data before jumping to conclusions.

PotatoSoup 02-17-2009 04:02 PM

I could give a damn about mag numbers and bench racing. I care more about qualitative opinions and analysis from experienced drivers like Randy Pobst.

Let me know when he rates the Camaro as one of the top 5 best-handling cars. Until then, there's always 5thgen.org if you're looking for people who share your love of the Transmarobird. :)

alnielsen 02-17-2009 04:08 PM


Originally Posted by devildog1679 (Post 2871934)
What's wrong with straight line speed if the handling is pretty decent. Just because a car is heavy doesn't mean it handles like a boat. Now can it handle as well as a RX-8, hell no, but who cares. It will provide the same kind of rush I got whenever I took an on ramp at crazy speeds. Though this will come in the form of neck snapping torque The Camaro is more then just about looks and speed, it's about the legacy of the badge.

Weight is important to making a car handle. A heavier car can't transition from a straight to a corner or from a corner to another corner like a lighter car can. It's mass resists the ability to turn more. It can only match a light car in a continuous corner, like a skid pad.

PotatoSoup 02-17-2009 04:11 PM

Don't get me started on the "legacy of the badge" when it comes to the Camaro. Everbody seems to point to the original model in that respect, which was a decent car for it day.

But everyone conveniently seems to forget the past 30 years of the Camaro, during which time it was blessed with hokey styling, crappy quality, and questionable performance. Oh yeah, the 4-cylinder Camaro from the 1980s that could do 0-60 in...never. Yeah, that's the kind of "badge legacy" I want in my next car. :uhh:

devildog1679 02-18-2009 12:39 PM


Originally Posted by PotatoSoup (Post 2871996)
I could give a damn about mag numbers and bench racing. I care more about qualitative opinions and analysis from experienced drivers like Randy Pobst.

Let me know when he rates the Camaro as one of the top 5 best-handling cars. Until then, there's always 5thgen.org if you're looking for people who share your love of the Transmarobird. :)

There are plenty of people on this board that appreciate the Camaro, there is nothing wrong with appreciating another car other then the 8. I loved my 8 but these two cars appease different parts of the soul.

If I'm not mistaken you were the only person to post a negative comment, while everyone else was trying to add substance to the thread.

dynamho 04-22-2009 02:06 PM

WTF? Brake weights on the Camaro?
http://cache.gawker.com/assets/image...ke_weights.jpg
http://jalopnik.com/5222908/2010-che...-brake-weights

wantan8 04-28-2009 05:11 PM

Brother just put a deposit down on his Camaro. He got the fully loaded V6 LT2 with RS package. The RS on the V6 comes with midnight silver 20 inch wheels which are to die for. Car came to 31 k which is pretty decent.

https://img237.imageshack.us/img237/...8778219fz5.jpg

Aznxkaiser 04-28-2009 05:15 PM

Shoulda gotten the V8

Transam kid 01 04-28-2009 05:18 PM

nice, but 31k for the 6banger...ouch. Although it will kick the crap out of an RX8 in a straight line lol. congrats

kvndoom 04-28-2009 05:19 PM


Originally Posted by Aznxkaiser (Post 2993518)
Shoulda gotten the V8

I could live with 300 horses under the hood.

ferg 04-28-2009 05:39 PM

im not feeling the ss, stay with an rx8

mscamp02 04-28-2009 05:49 PM

Wtf
 

Originally Posted by PotatoSoup (Post 2871805)
Who in hell cares?

Cars like the Camaro and Challenger are just big, stupid, heavy, go fast in a straight line, and that's it. Zero finesse.

If you want American muscle, buy a Mustang and get a FI setup. Or buy a ZR1 if you have the cash. That's a proper sports car.

ok so get a mustang for just about the same price as a new camaro and have over 100hp less....and thats your "proper sports car??? I mean seriously

zoom44 04-28-2009 05:53 PM


Originally Posted by thecow135 (Post 2628386)
who would care?


Bandit

wantan8 04-29-2009 04:31 PM


Originally Posted by Aznxkaiser (Post 2993518)
Shoulda gotten the V8

An extra 7k for the V8 with the same options. Considering the V6 is 306 hp and 28 mpg highway, tough to cough that kinda dough up. He couldn't afford it. Guess he preferred pimpin it with options versus straight-on power :).

mscamp02 04-29-2009 04:57 PM

^just get no options and get the ss1 package...30999 msrp :)

I could live with no options in a 400+ rwd sports car brand new for 31k...but maybe thats just me

Transam kid 01 04-29-2009 05:33 PM


Originally Posted by mscamp02 (Post 2995412)
^just get no options and get the ss1 package...30999 msrp :)

I could live with no options in a 400+ rwd sports car brand new for 31k...but maybe thats just me

this

Aznxkaiser 04-29-2009 05:36 PM

Seriously lol Why buy a muscle car for interior and luxury over V8 POWAA?

REsuperD 04-29-2009 06:33 PM

the thing is HUGE. looked good as a show car, should've trimmed the size a bit for production. more sports car, less poser/toy

mscamp02 04-29-2009 06:46 PM

^I kinda like it being a boat.....but then again I havent really seen one in person so I really cant say yet

wantan8 04-29-2009 07:15 PM

Some people don't care as much about straight line performance.

Like some RX8 owners.

warren(silver-roxy-8) 04-29-2009 07:58 PM

it's pretty heavy, you'd expect the camaro to be a lot lighter in weight than the challenger...not just a little lighter


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:08 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands