Notices
Series I Trouble Shooting This is the place to learn more about or discuss any issues you're having with your RX-8

change to redline mt90 and now :((((

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old 12-07-2009, 02:47 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
rx8montreal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
change to redline mt90 and now :((((

wow 20k on my tranny and now i changed to redline mt90 and now 4th and 5th grind pass 7k rpm
Old 12-07-2009, 02:58 PM
  #2  
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Mr.&Mrs.Magic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
that's because your using mt-90 you goof. It's too light and doesn't allow the syncros to align fast enough cause it's too thin. You need redline 75w90 NS for the tranny and the mt90 is for the diff. Now you can add a bit of MT90 to your tranny oil(75w90) if you so choose but 90 all by itself is too damn light.

Last edited by Mr.&Mrs.Magic; 12-07-2009 at 03:15 PM.
Old 12-07-2009, 03:00 PM
  #3  
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
chino0314's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
lmao^^^ GOOF lol
Old 12-07-2009, 03:09 PM
  #4  
That's a lie
iTrader: (1)
 
The Reverend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: I don't wear panties
Posts: 2,320
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
MT90 IS 75W90

http://www.redlineoil.com/product.aspx?pid=46&pcid=7
Old 12-07-2009, 03:11 PM
  #5  
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Mr.&Mrs.Magic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
^ummm no it's not but good try. they are both 75w90 but not the same.

http://www.redlineoil.com/product.aspx?pid=47&pcid=7

Last edited by Mr.&Mrs.Magic; 12-07-2009 at 03:14 PM.
Old 12-07-2009, 03:14 PM
  #6  
partyboy007
 
Leonardo Rosas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: seattle
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ummm i thought it was MT-90 for your tranny and 75W90 for your rear differential
Old 12-07-2009, 03:32 PM
  #7  
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Mr.&Mrs.Magic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
^your prob right. what do I know we'll let the experts sort it out. Lets go back a few post and try to correct my self. MTL not 75W90 NS

let me put the goof cap on.
Old 12-07-2009, 04:14 PM
  #8  
I8U
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
I8U's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Carolina Beach, NC
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll stick with my tried and true: Redline 75w90 in the diff and MTL and MT-90 mix in the trans. Or even better for those that like to play with the trans a little harder than most, 3/4 Redline 75w90 and 1/4 of Redline ATF...works like a charm!
Old 12-07-2009, 04:30 PM
  #9  
partyboy007
 
Leonardo Rosas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: seattle
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well that is just what i've got after navigating the oil threads don't trust us the goofs
Old 12-07-2009, 04:40 PM
  #10  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
What wrong with factory diff and tranny oil? Has worked great for me for 100,000 miles (obviously not on the original fill).
Old 12-07-2009, 05:30 PM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
rx8montreal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mmmm from what i've been said mt-90 is one of the best oil to put in our tranny! let the experts explain please.....
Old 12-07-2009, 05:49 PM
  #12  
He's as bad as Can
 
expo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester, NJ
Posts: 4,309
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr.&Mrs.Magic
they are both 75w90 but not the same.


All I can say that MT-90 meets Mazda specs and about 90,000 of the 138,000 miles on my trans have been on MT-90
Attached Thumbnails change to redline mt90 and now :((((-100_5145_900x600.shkl.jpg   change to redline mt90 and now :((((-specs.jpg  
Old 12-07-2009, 05:49 PM
  #13  
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Mr.&Mrs.Magic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
MT-90 is too slick for the synchros to line up when shifting fast at high rpm's. MT-90 is good and great stuff just not for a rx-8 with it's high rev. You need something with a bit more friction. We also have brss syncros so that pretty much throws out the GL-5's. There are a few GL-5's that do not contain sulfer but they are hard to come by so ither stick with oem or redline MTL, MTL with a bit of MT-90, or as stated by I8U 75w90 with ATF. If you fill like trying something new contact Charles R Hill of BHR and he may hook you up with ENEOS from Nippon. Worked well for me but I decied to change for no reason other than the tried and true MTL / MT-90 mix.

Last edited by Mr.&Mrs.Magic; 12-07-2009 at 05:52 PM.
Old 12-07-2009, 05:51 PM
  #14  
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Mr.&Mrs.Magic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by expo1


All I can say that MT-90 meets Mazda specs and about 90,000 of the 138,000 miles on my trans have been on MT-90
Doesn't RP also meets mazda specs?
Old 12-07-2009, 05:56 PM
  #15  
He's as bad as Can
 
expo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester, NJ
Posts: 4,309
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr.&Mrs.Magic
Doesn't RP also meets mazda specs?
I thought this thread was about Red Line?

As for Royal Purple I use their motor oil , but their gear oil products as well as Amsoil receive positives reviews too. I do not have anything negative to say about any gear oils.
Old 12-07-2009, 05:59 PM
  #16  
The Crawlster
 
josuar88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fort Lewis WA
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mobil 1 lol
Old 12-07-2009, 06:10 PM
  #17  
#50
 
bse50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Caput Mundi
Posts: 7,521
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr.&Mrs.Magic
MT-90 is too slick for the synchros to line up when shifting fast at high rpm's. MT-90 is good and great stuff just not for a rx-8 with it's high rev. You need something with a bit more friction. We also have brss syncros so that pretty much throws out the GL-5's. There are a few GL-5's that do not contain sulfer but they are hard to come by so ither stick with oem or redline MTL, MTL with a bit of MT-90, or as stated by I8U 75w90 with ATF. If you fill like trying something new contact Charles R Hill of BHR and he may hook you up with ENEOS from Nippon. Worked well for me but I decied to change for no reason other than the tried and true MTL / MT-90 mix.
You should stop with this nonsense, mt-90 is a good oil for our transmission. Things like "too slick for the synchros" etc are out of this world and any good search on this board will return the exact opposite of what you just wrote.
Old 12-07-2009, 06:14 PM
  #18  
Registered
 
Rodlucci's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had my concerns and I contacted Redline Tech support before I purchased Redline gear oil. The Tech stated "use MT 90 in RX8 manual transmissions as it does not have a Zinc Modifier.” He went on to say “the Zinc Modifier causes the gear oil to be to slick and not stick to the synchronizers.” I put MT 90 in and I am having good success. The tech said that MTL has the Zinc Modifier in it and it is good for the Differential. I had Zinc Modified gear oil in my Transmission for about a week and drained it due to grinding issues. I replaced it with MT 90 and all is good. If anyone has any questions about Redline products, call the Tech line and they will call you back if they are not able to talk when you call.
Old 12-08-2009, 01:47 AM
  #19  
Enthusiast
 
AJ's Shinka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: LAS VEGAS
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I used about 3 quarts of MT90 in my tranny and all is well. Is 3 quarts too much?
Old 12-08-2009, 01:55 AM
  #20  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Jasonawojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AJ's Shinka
I used about 3 quarts of MT90 in my tranny and all is well. Is 3 quarts too much?
Mine is usually full after just short of two. I doubt you could really overfill it though, it would just pour out the plug you fill it from.
Old 12-08-2009, 01:58 AM
  #21  
Grasshopper
iTrader: (1)
 
Jon316G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Streetsboro, OH
Posts: 6,779
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 33 Posts
^I'm pretty sure AJ's Shinka was joking there
And you can overfill it if you pour the oil through the shifter and don't remove the fill plug.
Old 12-08-2009, 02:18 AM
  #22  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
I used MT90 with a bit of MTL or just straight for a long time and was pretty happy with it.
Until I tried the Eneos stuff which blew my mind.
I'm never going back to the Redline stuff in the tranny.
Old 12-08-2009, 05:15 AM
  #23  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 31 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr.&Mrs.Magic
that's because your using mt-90 you goof. It's too light and doesn't allow the syncros to align fast enough cause it's too thin. You need redline 75w90 NS for the tranny and the mt90 is for the diff. Now you can add a bit of MT90 to your tranny oil(75w90) if you so choose but 90 all by itself is too damn light.
wtf

dude ... you have no idea what you're talking about ... please keep those bs to yourself .... seriously ... please ...
Old 12-08-2009, 06:12 AM
  #24  
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Mr.&Mrs.Magic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well it appears as if I have been missinformed by this forum once again. If I gave a damn I'd go back and find the thread discussing MT90 not allowing the syncros to align fast enough. To bad because I couldn't care less.
Old 12-08-2009, 08:12 AM
  #25  
Registered User
 
cBJr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I haven't had any trouble shifting quickly, but haven't really done much speed-shifting since my swap to MT90. I have noticed it is very difficult to get the car into 1st now with MT90. I didn't notice it at all before with what I assume was OEM oil (48k miles), but the weather also wasn't as cold before I swapped. Once the car warms up, it is fine, but in cold weather, going into 1st at anything over 10mph is pretty damn hard.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: change to redline mt90 and now :((((



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 AM.