Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Used Oil Analysis - Post Them Here

Old 01-07-2010, 02:27 PM
  #101  
Super Moderator
 
ASH8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,861
Received 316 Likes on 225 Posts
Originally Posted by PhillipM
That depends how far you drive each day, I used to do 4 hours of commuting per day, 5-6 if the traffic was bad...
Well derr!!!...

Yeah and a 4 hour commute can be 20 or 400 KMS
Forget it mate..you don't want to see what I am saying...typical POM
Old 01-07-2010, 02:32 PM
  #102  
Super Moderator
 
ASH8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,861
Received 316 Likes on 225 Posts
Originally Posted by SpIcEz
Isnt most of the difference usually because of taxes?
I most countires that is found not to be the case..
Here about a third is Tax..
Old 01-07-2010, 03:59 PM
  #103  
Registered
 
PhillipM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ASH8
Well derr!!!...

Yeah and a 4 hour commute can be 20 or 400 KMS
Forget it mate..you don't want to see what I am saying...typical POM

The car's probably using just as much fuel if you're doing 5mph in rushhour traffic for 30 miles as it is on a long 60mph cruise for 100 miles....


Just because the country is bigger doesn't mean people travel for longer
Old 01-07-2010, 04:10 PM
  #104  
SARX Legend
Thread Starter
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
TX

And to think I used to complain spending $400.00 a month on gas when I was doing an 80 mile a day commute. In your country it would have been $1200.00 a month
Old 01-07-2010, 05:54 PM
  #105  
SARX Legend
Thread Starter
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
REDRX3RX8 was kind enough to share his UOA, take a look.
Old 01-07-2010, 06:59 PM
  #106  
Registered
 
Spirograph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting. Did anyone post results of dino diesel 15w40 oil with 3k+ miles? I saw that OD posted his results which held the viscosities in range, but that was only with 1k miles.

Also, is anyone running Mobil's synthetic diesel? What is the viscosity range, and is it a full "real" syn?
Old 01-07-2010, 07:10 PM
  #107  
SARX Legend
Thread Starter
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
No but all UOA's are welcome and appreciated. Mine has been sent, I should get it soon.
Old 01-07-2010, 07:39 PM
  #108  
Registered
 
REDRX3RX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 713
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Wink Oil viscosity in range

Oh, really?

What range viscosity do you want? Do you want the 7 to 8cst@ 100C of 5w20 or the 15 to 16cst @ 100c of 20w50? Yeah, Mobil 1 0w40 spec sheet says approx 14cst@100c, but thats just candy and nuts, and the specs show way over a 10w30. My report still had a some 5w20 and the usual fuel dump even though I was real careful to heat up car before sampling.

People that bring up (didn't stay in range) are have 40 year old info from Andy Granatelli selling STP viscosity improver. These new 0w oils get the weight from good chemistry buildup not just throwing in extra vi improver which can cause hard carbon.

Your knee seems a little jerky.
Old 01-07-2010, 08:28 PM
  #109  
3-wheeler
 
Flashwing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by REDRX3RX8
Oh, really?

What range viscosity do you want? Do you want the 7 to 8cst@ 100C of 5w20 or the 15 to 16cst @ 100c of 20w50? Yeah, Mobil 1 0w40 spec sheet says approx 14cst@100c, but thats just candy and nuts, and the specs show way over a 10w30. My report still had a some 5w20 and the usual fuel dump even though I was real careful to heat up car before sampling.

People that bring up (didn't stay in range) are have 40 year old info from Andy Granatelli selling STP viscosity improver. These new 0w oils get the weight from good chemistry buildup not just throwing in extra vi improver which can cause hard carbon.

Your knee seems a little jerky.
This isn't the first UOA that I've seen showing the Mobile1 0w-40 thins out to a high 30w oil from the 40w range. Sure the fuel dilution didn't help but overall this oil does seem to lose a bit of it's viscosity over time.

Still, when we're talking about 1 to 2 cSt of viscosity loss that's really not a huge deal. Even less when you're looking at that loss occurring over 4,000 miles of use.

As for Diesel oil...just remember that oil choice comes down to application. You can run just about anything off the shelf in your motor and you'll be ok but some stuff is simply a better fit for how you use the car.
Old 01-07-2010, 08:42 PM
  #110  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
sorta like asking what car is best---well it depends. Use the uoa to develop your trend--dont take just a single reading.
uoa can be tricky.
OD
Old 01-07-2010, 09:14 PM
  #111  
Registered
 
rx8convert22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Jessup, MD
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Spirograph
Interesting. Did anyone post results of dino diesel 15w40 oil with 3k+ miles? I saw that OD posted his results which held the viscosities in range, but that was only with 1k miles.

Also, is anyone running Mobil's synthetic diesel? What is the viscosity range, and is it a full "real" syn?
Take a look at my analysis I had done on 15W40 with 3k on it. It still was within range. There is a link to my post on the first page of this thread.
Old 01-07-2010, 10:03 PM
  #112  
SARX Legend
Thread Starter
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
Take a look at my analysis I had done on 15W40 with 3k on it. It still was within range. There is a link to my post on the first page of this thread.
Dang dude, I missed that post. Thanks!!

Care to share your driving habits? Viscosity is low.


Last edited by 9krpmrx8; 01-07-2010 at 10:10 PM.
Old 01-08-2010, 04:13 AM
  #113  
Registered
 
REDRX3RX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 713
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
TX rx8convert22 15w40

This uoa is from your 5w30 @ 14k, and with the usual excess fuel looks like 0w20. I saw your uoa on your Shell Rotella 15w40 diesel oil with 12.5 cst@100c, and you have found your oil.

I know a guy in West Texas with the usual Chevy pu with 350 v8 that is still running at around 1/2 million miles without any internal work using Rotella 15w40.

You and olddragger are onto something because its over kill additives @ good price.

I run 0w40 Mobil 1 because it tests about 12cst @ 100c to maybe stop that front stationary bearing wear, and it tested the most hp and torque of many heavy weight in a dyno test.

Old 01-08-2010, 05:00 AM
  #114  
Registered
 
Spirograph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I'm still split between sticking with Rotella 15-40, and switching to Mobil1 0-40. But the good news is that they both sound solid for the Renesis. Maybe I'll run a 50/50 blend of the two.
Old 01-08-2010, 10:21 AM
  #115  
SARX Legend
Thread Starter
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
Hey RX8Convert22, you mind if the mods merge our two threads? I didn't realize you had started one and there is some great info there as well.
Old 01-08-2010, 10:32 AM
  #116  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
GeorgeH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Question: Shouldn't we be looking at wear metals in addition to viscosity, in order to get a better grip on the bearing wear issue?
Old 01-08-2010, 12:53 PM
  #117  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
yes.
and that SHOULD be viscosity related.
Old 01-08-2010, 12:56 PM
  #118  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
GeorgeH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
^and additive.
Old 01-08-2010, 01:44 PM
  #119  
3-wheeler
 
Flashwing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by olddragger
yes.
and that SHOULD be viscosity related.
Old 01-08-2010, 01:54 PM
  #120  
SARX Legend
Thread Starter
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
Wear metals were high in my GC 0W-30 and the were slightly higher in the 15W-40 vs. the Mobil1 0W-40 results posted by REDRX3RX8. I wish we could create some type of comparison chart for the renny. There are a lot of variables here.
Old 01-08-2010, 03:16 PM
  #121  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
GeorgeH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
It will take a tremendous amount of data to prove meaningful correlations between viscosity & bearing wear via UOA. Case in point, if I'm not mistaken, one of the reports on this thread with the lowest Iron content is somebody running Castrol 5w20.

I still think UOAs are good idea, and I'll post my results here soon. But, an enterprising person could start a spreadsheet and collect the data as it is entered, and over time we could, perhaps, begin to see trends.
Old 01-08-2010, 04:38 PM
  #122  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
yep--- its more trend related for that particular engine that on a unified grand scale of things.
With enough data maybe some specific cooralation could be done--but yes i agree it would take a lot.

One thing I believe that has already become apparent ---the viscosity showings are mostly so far not standing up as some may think?
The flash points are lower than some may think also?
When it comes to wear metals---a LOT has to taken into consideration--including air filtration
driving enviroment, temps, adverage load on engine etc. I know you can make a case on the same affecting viscosity and it does but you can have wear metals without viscosity probs but not the otherway around?
OD
Old 01-08-2010, 05:27 PM
  #123  
3-wheeler
 
Flashwing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GeorgeH
It will take a tremendous amount of data to prove meaningful correlations between viscosity & bearing wear via UOA. Case in point, if I'm not mistaken, one of the reports on this thread with the lowest Iron content is somebody running Castrol 5w20.

I still think UOAs are good idea, and I'll post my results here soon. But, an enterprising person could start a spreadsheet and collect the data as it is entered, and over time we could, perhaps, begin to see trends.
Once again George thank you for being a voice of reason.
Old 01-08-2010, 06:02 PM
  #124  
SARX Legend
Thread Starter
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
Ok Fellas!! Got a present today.

Last edited by 9krpmrx8; 01-08-2010 at 10:43 PM.
Old 01-08-2010, 09:44 PM
  #125  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
nice Z&P levels.
and this is a synthetic --right?
i dont have the ability to scan mine in but i will type it out

Brand new engine
oil use interval 2K (after the 1st 500 miles with break in OIL)
diesel oil 15w/40
al--1
chr-5
iron-19
copper-2
lead-15
tin-1
moly-12
nickel 1
magenese 0
silver--0
Titanium and potasium --o
boron--44
silicon--10
sodium 6
calcium 1098
manesium-620
phos-912
zinc--1050
barium-0

sub viscosity at 210F = 61.0 should be 70-81
cST vis at 100C =10.50 --should be 12.9-16
flashpoint 355 should be greater than 390
fuel % 1.8%

not too bad for a new engine.
next will be maybe in 2 weeks and i am waiting to see if my higher oil temps have improved the fuel percentage.
OD

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Used Oil Analysis - Post Them Here



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:21 PM.