Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Engine Cover Needed?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-04-2004, 05:21 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
kirkdt800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Goodyear, AZ
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Engine Cover Needed?

Do you need to leave the engine cover on? Does it have any real purpose? Should I use synthetic oil? Just kidding...I am sure you guys are sick of talking about oil. I would like to know about the cover, though. It seems pretty useless to me. Thanks.
Old 11-04-2004, 05:45 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
rx8cited's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: DC Metro Area, USA
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kirkdt800
Do you need to leave the engine cover on? Does it have any real purpose? ....
Forum member MazdaManiac did some temperature measurements and found that the cover keeps the engine running cooler ....... besides it looks cool too!

rx8cited
Old 11-05-2004, 10:11 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
kdlunde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Welll, I can say from experience that it doesn't keep the '8 from running. I had my '8 in for M flash and some other doodads to add on last month. 3 weeks later was the first time I needed to get into the hood (to add oil) and what do I see? No engine cover! I ended up calling the dealer and had them overnight the cover back to me (since they're 2 1/2 hours away). There doesn't seem to have been any adverse effect of the cover not being there, but I'm happier now that my baby is complete!

Kern
Old 11-05-2004, 10:31 AM
  #4  
He's as bad as Can
 
expo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester, NJ
Posts: 4,309
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Installed the MazdaSpeed strut tower brace about three weeks ago and the stock engine cover does not fit anymore. Been running without it since and the only thing I have noticed is a little more engine noise, which I find a good thing on the RX-8. Guess I will hang it on the wall now.
Old 11-05-2004, 10:45 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
cortc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is not required...
Old 11-05-2004, 11:45 AM
  #6  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Irish_in_a_RX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Philly
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by cortc
It is not required...
Research has been done that it is required, and keeps the engine cooler. Do a search for more results.

Of course not using it will not harm the car by any means..perhaps alittle added dust in the bay.

Wayne
Old 11-05-2004, 12:37 PM
  #7  
Mmmmm... Rotary Donut
 
G8rboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL (NW Chicago Burbs)
Posts: 2,376
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Mine has been a wall decoration for most of that last year, and since I installed the MS shock tower brace it's permanently off. While it might keep the temps a few degrees cooler, I really think it's a marketing thing- unlike a large piston engine with cam covers, intake/exhaust manifolds, and other neat stuff to look at, all you see under our hoods is the alternator and intake bits. The Renesis is so small and buried so low and to the back, there's just not much too look at.
Old 11-05-2004, 01:44 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
bureau13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cooler, yes. A little. Required? Nah.

jds

Originally Posted by Irish_in_a_RX8
Research has been done that it is required, and keeps the engine cooler. Do a search for more results.

Of course not using it will not harm the car by any means..perhaps alittle added dust in the bay.

Wayne
Old 11-06-2004, 10:34 PM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
kirkdt800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Goodyear, AZ
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool, thanks for all the tips. I think I'll leave it on...for now anyway.
Old 11-07-2004, 06:46 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
scoop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just another slant, it might keep the hood a bit cooler and thus the paint in better shape there in the long run. On one of my other very old red cars the hood is much more oxidized than the roof and trunk lid which presumably saw a similar amount of UV in their lifetime. Both cars are very well insulated under the hood but the 8 seems to be a furnace in comparison so I will leave my cover in place, it may make a difference. I will let you know in 10 years ;-)
Old 11-07-2004, 08:44 PM
  #11  
Stuck in a love triangle
 
JeRKy 8 Owner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Clearly you haventheard of Mazdas shame policy. Theyve providedus w/the fancylooking engine cover to conceal the embarassment ofhaving two rotors w/o a turbocharger anywhere in sight.

Seriously thoughI noticedthat in the pastwhen I took the cover off and drove the car hard - that 8 minute cool down fan system was more likely tocome on when I turned off the car -- then when I kept the cover on w/the same driving conditions. Thenagain I cant be too sure that Imay have justbeen drivingthe car harder for that week I had the coveroff.

Regardless Im just keeping the cover on in accordance w/Mazdas shame policy. Itll stay there until its no longer hiding something that hurts when you look at it.
Old 11-08-2004, 07:11 AM
  #12  
cry me a river...
 
EZZY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Syd / Melb
Posts: 4,475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JeRKy 8 Owner
Clearly you haventheard of Mazdas shame policy. Theyve providedus w/the fancylooking engine cover to conceal the embarassment ofhaving two rotors w/o a turbocharger anywhere in sight.
Old 11-08-2004, 08:37 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
cortc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The MS RX8s do not have the cover...
Old 11-08-2004, 01:47 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
bureau13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Somewhere on here there is an underhood picture of an RX-8 w/ the 4pt brace and a different engine cover that says MAZDASPEED on it. However, that is the ONLY such picture I've seen, so it may have been a one-off or something.

jds
Old 11-08-2004, 04:28 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Red Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It very well may make the underhood temperatures a bit cooler. But if it was that integral, I would think the factory would state so somewhere in the manual, and also, if the engine cover is that important, they seriously once again underengineered the cooling system. I don't think they're going to make that FD-like mistake again.
Old 11-09-2004, 01:37 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
bureau13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Providing for air flow is an integral part of any cooling solution (that involves air :D) so in this case it wouldn't necessarily be underengineered...it would be a part of the solution. That said, I don't think anyone is suggesting its critical. It apparently does help somewhat however, and even if its just a small amount, every little bit helps.

jds
Old 11-09-2004, 02:19 AM
  #17  
'RX-EIGHT'
 
RXE16T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did the 13B TT equipped FD have an engine cover?

Or what about the 20B TT equipped Cosmo?

No to both.
I imagine both of these motors generated a lot more underbonnet heat then the Renesis, so the 8 should be fine without it.

IMO, it's just a decorative feature of the car designed to conceal the "ugly" engine, ala Europe's finest such as BMW, Merc and Audi.

Afterall, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
Old 11-09-2004, 03:24 AM
  #18  
cry me a river...
 
EZZY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Syd / Melb
Posts: 4,475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im 99.99999% sure that the cover is there to hide the ugly looking, tiny, 3-moving-part engine. pure **** factor.
mazda should've designed a bonnet with some sort of vent to reduce the engine bay temp. just pop the bonnet and look at the engine bay, what kind of air flow does it provide with the cover on?
Old 11-09-2004, 06:14 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
rx8cited's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: DC Metro Area, USA
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nojooc
Did the 13B TT equipped FD have an engine cover?

Or what about the 20B TT equipped Cosmo?

No to both.
I imagine both of these motors generated a lot more underbonnet heat then the Renesis, so the 8 should be fine without it.......
Hmmm, I wonder how many other parts you can strip of your RX-8 by doing comparisons to these other cars . I gotta' ask - is your cover on or off?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vapor2
West For Sale/Wanted
11
11-03-2020 03:38 PM
Jesus Martinez
Series I Tech Garage
42
03-23-2016 09:08 PM
akagc
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
08-11-2015 07:07 PM
ShadowDragon78
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
7
08-11-2015 06:42 AM
SayDfuse
Series I Exterior Appearance and Body Kits
3
08-03-2015 10:41 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Engine Cover Needed?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16 PM.