Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

New Throttle Body??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-07-2007, 08:08 AM
  #1  
Bigus Rotus
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Nemesis8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
New Throttle Body??

Go here and scroll half way down the page, is this a new throttle body?
Attached Thumbnails New Throttle Body??-p684-b1.jpg  
Old 05-07-2007, 08:20 AM
  #2  
Uncle sam wants YOU!
 
Swedishmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Fort worth / Dallas
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it looks like it would be for the Rx8 ... for a little more than $500.00. wonder if it'll make it over here any time soon. it's got an odd shape to it though..think it's compatible with most intakes out there?
Old 05-07-2007, 09:20 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
sosonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
It does appear they are selling this for the RX-8. I'm very interested in the performance gain for NA RX-8s with a modified throttle body. I've read about the new NA 350Z's dual throttle body and was just wondering what something like this would do for the NA RX-8.
Old 05-07-2007, 09:29 AM
  #5  
Banned
 
eviltwinkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: everywherez...
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The TB is not a problem in the RX8...kinda pointless...
Old 05-07-2007, 11:05 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
gh0st's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i agree, the enginerring in the stock TB has really impressed me.
Old 05-07-2007, 11:41 AM
  #7  
Mazsport.net
 
MazsportScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the shop
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just FYI, If anyone is looking for a bolt-on mechanical unit let me know. We have put a few of them on race cars and they work really well. Scott
Old 05-07-2007, 11:55 AM
  #8  
Banned
 
eviltwinkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: everywherez...
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by MazsportScott
Just FYI, If anyone is looking for a bolt-on mechanical unit let me know. We have put a few of them on race cars and they work really well. Scott
Innnnnnttteeerrrrreeesssstttiiinnnnggggg....

=)
Old 05-07-2007, 10:31 PM
  #9  
Thread Pirate, Ahhrrrrr
 
SmokeyTheBalrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Scott, I don't suppose you would be willing to elaborate?
Old 05-07-2007, 11:15 PM
  #10  
the shit starter
 
Keef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ya, Scott if you could elaborate that'd be fine and dandy...

From my understanding the only difference we could expect from a mechanical TB compared too our electrical one is a quicker response?

Does their exist any actual hp gains from changing our TB from a big circle too three small ones?
Old 05-07-2007, 11:42 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
gh0st's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the stock TB flows enouph cfm for an NA motor. i doubt there would really be any hp increases. but, on the flipside, i know that formula mazda uses a different TB. im not sure why though.
Old 05-08-2007, 12:57 AM
  #12  
Banned
 
eviltwinkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: everywherez...
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Smoother response with a cabled TB...when tracking it gives you more control over the car...you notice the lag and sensitivity issues w/ an electronic version.
Old 05-08-2007, 06:18 AM
  #13  
Thread Pirate, Ahhrrrrr
 
SmokeyTheBalrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks evil, that cleared things up.
Old 05-08-2007, 08:48 AM
  #14  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,719
Received 2,007 Likes on 1,636 Posts
as clear as mud, if you have access to the e-throttle software and control you can program in whatever response you want ...
Old 05-08-2007, 08:53 AM
  #15  
Banned
 
eviltwinkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: everywherez...
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
as clear as mud, if you have access to the e-throttle software and control you can program in whatever response you want ...
As clear as your face! ha...

That I did NOT know...I figured it would just be easier to cable the thing...you wouldnt happen to know where one could find said software?

While we are talking about it...anyone have any insightful comments on a cabled vs. e-throttle debate? Is e-throttle going to ultimately be better? If so why?

Last edited by eviltwinkie; 05-08-2007 at 08:55 AM.
Old 05-08-2007, 09:01 AM
  #16  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,719
Received 2,007 Likes on 1,636 Posts
it amazes me that somebody posts a part, somebody else makes a comment, and then a bunch of other people suddenly think they're experts who need it, want it, gotta have it ...
Old 05-08-2007, 09:21 AM
  #17  
Banned
 
eviltwinkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: everywherez...
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
it amazes me that somebody posts a part, somebody else makes a comment, and then a bunch of other people suddenly think they're experts who need it, want it, gotta have it ...
Pfft...of course dont you know in the end he with the most toys / biggest shlong wins?

I personally dont need the TB...but your comment on the e-throttle was interesting as its something I have never really thought about. Specifically in regards to making adjustments. I mean most of the "hardcore" setups I have seen on other cars which see track duty only usually go with a cabled setup. So I wonder if thats partially because its a carryover from the old school or if e-throttles have some shortcoming. I dont really have an opinion about it yet, but now you got me thinking you baggy bastage. Its too early to start thinking damnit...
Old 05-08-2007, 09:41 AM
  #18  
Bigus Rotus
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Nemesis8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
LOL - I was just wanting to know why this is being offered? It did spark a debate I see, which is fine. That's what this forum is for, and we all know we cannot resist posting our comments.

I would like to hear more from Scott on his alternate throttle body...
Old 05-08-2007, 09:49 AM
  #19  
Registered User
 
sosonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I was thinking that an improved throttle body could only do so much...

1. Get more AIR.

But, is our present throttle body giving us all the air we can handle on NA already?
Or is it?

2. Be more responsive.

How and why can we improve on responsiveness?
Old 05-08-2007, 10:20 AM
  #20  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
well for one thing --it would be easier to set your idle speed........
olddragger
Old 05-08-2007, 10:35 AM
  #21  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Capacity UP throttle- google translator
Old 05-08-2007, 04:30 PM
  #22  
Registered
 
rotarenvy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: QLD .au
Posts: 1,802
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
aren't the old rx-7 throttles set with primary and secondary butterflies? that may possibly increase low end power.
Old 05-08-2007, 05:35 PM
  #23  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
The RX-8 throttlebody does electronically what the RX-7 throttlebodies needed 3 plates to even get closed to doing since the primary plate on the RX-7 tb opens 20% of the way before the secondaries kick in. The RX-8 has a 75mm throttlebody. There is NO more power to be had from going larger! You can't flow nearly enough. The intake on the Renesis is actually quite nice. I see no point in trying to replace it with anything else whereas on a 13B I do see a benefit in a new throttledoby and intake manifold. Get rid of the new throttlebody idea. You will never need one and if you think you will, you're wrong!
Old 05-09-2007, 09:58 AM
  #24  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
BoosTED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 2,896
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Have any test results on Scott's throttle body or the RE one been posted?


Old 05-09-2007, 11:44 AM
  #25  
Registered User
 
evilmiata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Apollo Beach, FL
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've got an adaptor plate and 4.6l Mustang throttle body for a mechanical conversion if anyone is interested. The 4.6l throttle is a *slightly* smaller diameter than the stock RX8.

Removing the stock throttle body will affect DSC, TC, and cruise control. You'll also need a stand alone ECU, like the extra TEC3r with RX8 harnesses like the one I have lying around.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: New Throttle Body??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:12 PM.