Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

Anybody else with RB CAI notice this?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-03-2005, 11:39 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Ole Spiff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Inland Empire, SoCalif
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anybody else with RB CAI notice this?

I've had the RB CAI on my car for a few weeks now and yesterday I noticed for the first time that the exhaust tips aren't building up soot on them like they were before. I wash my car regularly, including cleaning the soot off the tips of the exhaust (I have the RB exhaust) so I'm used to having to do that each time I wash the car. Yesterday when I washed it I noticed the normal build-up wasn't there. There was a tiny bit on there but practically nothing compared to what it usually is (was). It didn't do this when I had installed the REVi a few months back, so the only thing that's changed the last few weeks is I added the CAI. I did switch to 2 tanks of 91 octane just prior to adding the CAI but had already gone back to 87 octane when I installed it.

Anybody else experiencing this? I use Shell gas exclusively.
Old 09-03-2005, 11:48 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Rx-A-Ho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Same thing happended to me. Really made me scratch my head for a bit. Almost no soot build up.
Old 09-03-2005, 01:52 PM
  #3  
Rampage!!! Arghh!!!
 
brightnova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does this mean the fuel is burning less rich? Can anyone explain it?
Old 09-03-2005, 09:28 PM
  #4  
RX8 ADDICTED!!!
 
Tigster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by brightnova
Does this mean the fuel is burning less rich? Can anyone explain it?
This is my guess, the first reason is it does help to slightly lean the car out at driving. The other reason is it helps reduce the intake temps, when your cars intake temps get too hot your ecu will dump more gas into the car running it richer to help cool down.

Now it is time to be critized and told my explination is wrong. Oh well
Old 09-04-2005, 12:59 AM
  #5  
My Goodness My Guinness
 
Moonrover333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The OC, Maryland
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok hang on a sec our cars are ok to run on 87 cause my fuel door says premium only so i've been paying like 3.45 /gal for nothing?
Old 09-04-2005, 01:43 AM
  #6  
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Razz1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cali
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I would use Premium. Less carbon build up.
Old 09-04-2005, 01:52 AM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Ole Spiff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Inland Empire, SoCalif
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Razz1
I would use Premium. Less carbon build up.
Actually it's the opposite; premium has MORE carbon build-up because it burns slower. This is why the gas companies put so many detergent additives in premium.
Old 09-04-2005, 01:58 AM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Ole Spiff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Inland Empire, SoCalif
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Moonrover333
ok hang on a sec our cars are ok to run on 87 cause my fuel door says premium only so i've been paying like 3.45 /gal for nothing?
For best performance it is recommended that you use Premium according to Mazda, however you can use regular. Some RX8's (mine luckily is one of them) actually have better responsiveness with regular; many can run it without any detectable change in performance. A few apparently don't run well with it but that seems to be noticable right away if you put regular in it.

Try it. With gas prices climbing like they are little or no change in performance is no big deal if your car runs okay with regular. If filling up starts to exceed $50 per tank, any savings will help.
Old 09-04-2005, 02:10 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Fanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Big debate on this. Ole Spiff is of the side that 87 is no different than 91 (and may even be better). Other side (and Mazda) states that with 87 the engine retards timing and decreases performance of the car. Fine for everyday driving, but will affect high performance.

As to the original question, a few dynos have shown that when the people on this board installed the RB REVi, it did indeed lean out the engine a bit.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shankapotamus3
Series I Trouble Shooting
28
03-14-2021 03:53 PM
Michael Bryant
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
5
10-12-2015 03:07 PM
duworm
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
1
10-01-2015 04:57 PM
Zube6115
Series I Trouble Shooting
8
09-30-2015 12:57 PM
Racingjunkie
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
2
09-29-2015 05:05 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Anybody else with RB CAI notice this?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 PM.