Notices
RX-8 Multimedia/Photo Gallery Share your pics,videos or links to them.

New M3 Miata

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-25-2003, 03:33 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
state island's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: -miami,fl-
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New M3 Miata

new M3 Miata wat do u think?
Old 01-25-2003, 03:46 PM
  #2  
Drive it like U stole it!
 
ZoomZoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Woodbridge, Ontario
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks great... where can we get more information?
Old 01-25-2003, 03:48 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
state island's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: -miami,fl-
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
THEY JUST HAD THE PICTURE AND IT SAID 'NEW M3 MIATA?http://www.mscw.com/ LOOK ON THE RIGTH AND SCROLL DOWN.

Last edited by state island; 01-25-2003 at 03:50 PM.
Old 01-25-2003, 04:29 PM
  #4  
Son what is your Alibi?
iTrader: (1)
 
PoLaK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
that looks like a rotary bludge in the hood
Old 01-25-2003, 09:24 PM
  #5  
rotary courage
 
m477's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: :uoıʇɐɔoן
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like a combination of:

1) current Miata
2) RX-8
3) that ugly-as-hell 4th gen RX-7 photochop that some Japanese car tabloid made up

Surprisingly, it looks pretty decent. That front grille opening definitely needs work though.
Old 01-25-2003, 10:18 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
jmanolov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
THIS PICTURE IS A SCAM!!!

Has been discussed many times at Miataforum.com and has been confirmed from Mazda and Bwob (the Miata father) that it has nothing to do with the 3rd generation Miata.

It is someone's photoshob job between Miata and Jaguar F-type prototype.

If you need more info - check www.miataforum.com

Alas, there are no leaked 3rd gen Miata pics yet ...
Old 01-26-2003, 04:22 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
MattFast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Holland
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks a lot like the Jaguar F-type

Old 01-26-2003, 11:32 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
xmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why didn't Jaguar actually build that car for chrissakes. I love that shape...
Old 01-26-2003, 11:47 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
jbebernes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm glad the picture is bogus - I think it's ugly...too close to the Z4.
Old 01-26-2003, 12:20 PM
  #10  
zoom zoom
 
chinx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: soCal
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

why is it called the M3? where is this from, from one of those japanese spy photo magazines?

if they drop a rotary in the next miata (how likely is that?), would they have to call it the RX-5 Miata instead of the MX-5? ha :D
Old 01-26-2003, 12:25 PM
  #11  
zoom zoom
 
chinx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: soCal
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
jag didn't build the f-type 'cuz of $$$ reasons, partly 'cuz ford is not letting thru the f-type development cost. it's sad, 'cuz the f-type would've boosted jag, it's jag's ticket to another jackpot. the dumb part is ford kept dumping gazillions of dollar into jaguar racing (formerly jackie stewart racing), and it's pretty akin to flushing that money down a very big toilet 'cuz jag racing is a joke. if they can cut that out and direct that money to the f-type... but it was similar w/ mazda couple years ago, when ford pulled the plug on rotary w/ mazda, but the rx-8 still came thru, and the 8 is GREAt, so maybe...
Old 01-26-2003, 01:30 PM
  #12  
RX-VIII
 
Vaillant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by chinx
why is it called the M3? where is this from, from one of those japanese spy photo magazines?
'90-'97 Miata = M1 or NA
'99-'04 (or '05) Miata = M2 or NB
'05+ Miata = M3 or NC
Old 01-26-2003, 01:44 PM
  #13  
zoom zoom
 
chinx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: soCal
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oh i see. i knew the na/nb designation, didn't know the m1/m2. thanks. btw, what's the difference b/t NA6C and NA8C miatas? NB6C and NB8C? what's the designation of the rx-8?
Old 01-26-2003, 01:50 PM
  #14  
RX-VIII
 
Vaillant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by chinx
oh i see. i knew the na/nb designation, didn't know the m1/m2. thanks. btw, what's the difference b/t NA6C and NA8C miatas? NB6C and NB8C? what's the designation of the rx-8?
NA6C = NA Miata, 1.6 Liter engine (this is in the '90 to '93 US Miata)
NA8C = NA Miata, 1.8 Liter engine (this is in the '94 to '97 US Miata)


Same goes for the NB Miata. The 1.6L isn't available here in the US, but it is available in other places around the world. In my opinion (which doesn't amount to very much) the Miata should come in a 1.6L and a 2.0L version. I think in racing in Japan, the two cut-offs are 1.6L and 2.0L which leaves the 1.8L out in no man's land.

I don't know the RX-8 designation...you'll have to ask some Rotorheads. I'm a big fan of the Miata (cheap RWD!) and of Mazda (I convinced my girlfriend to buy a Protege5), but am still learning about the rotary stuff.
Old 01-26-2003, 09:46 PM
  #15  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
hornbm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bothell, WA
Posts: 503
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
actually the RX-8 will be the FE.

Heres proof.

http://home.att.net/~mazdarx8/202-0104_IMG.JPG

Old 01-30-2003, 10:20 AM
  #16  
zoom zoom
 
chinx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: soCal
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
like...FE3S?

that means the next rx7 will be called something else...like FF?
Old 01-30-2003, 10:58 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
jmanolov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some call them M1 and M2, but often get laughted at because of this. The proper names are NA and NB. Check this thread. (Bwob posting there is one of the miata creators - known as the Miata father )

http://www.miataforum.com/ubb/ultima...;f=11;t=009859


Originally posted by chinx
oh i see. i knew the na/nb designation, didn't know the m1/m2. thanks. btw, what's the difference b/t NA6C and NA8C miatas? NB6C and NB8C? what's the designation of the rx-8?

Last edited by jmanolov; 01-30-2003 at 11:06 AM.
Old 01-30-2003, 01:14 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
SmokingClutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: PA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like FE17 for the RX-8. The last two digits don't fit in with other Mazda chassis numbers but then the RX-8 is hard to classify.

First two digits - chassis number
Third digit - some form of the engine displacement
Fourth digit - body style

examples:

RX-3 coupe:
S122 (Chassis S1, 1.2L, 2 door)

RX-3 sedan:
S124 (Chassis S1, 1.2L, 4 door)

79-80 RX-7:
SA22 (Chassis SA, 1.2L, 2 door)

These changed a bit in the early 80s...

RX-7 GSL-SE:
FB3S (Chassis FB, 1.3L, sedan, meaning not a convertible)

2nd gen RX-7:
FC3S (Chassis FB, 1.3L, sedan, meaning not a convertible)

2nd gen RX-7 convertible:
FC3C (Chassis FB, 1.3L, convertible)

As you can see this extends to the Miata, NA or NB for the chassis, 6 or 8 for the 1.6 or 1.8, and C for convertible. If there were a Miata coupe it'd probably be NB8S.

Other Mazdas share this nomenclature, sometimes with a fifth digit for bodystyle thrown in (W for wagon, C for coupe) that confuses things a bit but it's mostly consistent.

So for future cars you might get...

4th gen RX-7 with 1.5L Renesis (remember the RX-7 would use the RX-8 chassis) - FE5S
3rd gen Miata with 2.0L - NC0C
Old 01-30-2003, 03:05 PM
  #19  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
if it was not a production car why would it need to have a vin number in the first place? maybe this is just(big word for the day:p ) obfuscation on mazda's part since the number doesn't follow the norm?
Old 01-30-2003, 03:26 PM
  #20  
Señor Member
 
Fëakhelek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Johnstown, Pennsylvania USA
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They did run them on public highways, so I imagine they have to have a VIN (Vehicle Identification Number). Just 'cause it was hand built doesn't mean it doesn't need to be identified.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Evan Gray
Series I Trouble Shooting
4
11-24-2015 01:00 AM
FubarI33t
New Member Forum
12
09-28-2015 08:45 PM
SBGarage
Vendor Classifieds
0
09-06-2015 03:30 PM
SBGarage
Sakebomb Garage
0
09-06-2015 03:29 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: New M3 Miata



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 PM.