Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

Would you want to see a Ford RX8 called the Probe?

Old 01-14-2007, 02:28 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
TALAN7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Roselle, NJ
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would you want to see a Ford RX8 called the Probe?

What if Ford built a car off the Rx8 chassis and called it the Probe. Would you be interested in it. If so, what kind of engine? Piston or Rotary?
Old 01-14-2007, 02:33 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
Old Rotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern California
Posts: 2,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

the Mazda 4cyl that has 500HP!!!


http://rotarynews.com/node/view/879

Last edited by Old Rotor; 01-16-2007 at 05:00 PM.
Old 01-14-2007, 02:46 PM
  #3  
He's as bad as Can
 
expo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester, NJ
Posts: 4,309
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Rotary, Then there might be greater aftermarket support for this car.
Old 01-14-2007, 02:50 PM
  #4  
Registered
 
Old Rotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern California
Posts: 2,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats a good idea.
Old 01-14-2007, 03:01 PM
  #5  
Shock and Awe
 
NoTears316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,871
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by expo1
Rotary, Then there might be greater aftermarket support for this car.
I agree with this, but that would be the only reason. Otherwise, I would not want to see it.
Old 01-14-2007, 03:02 PM
  #6  
the shit starter
 
Keef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no, Ford is too dumb to understand a rotary engine... If they want to make a sports car out of it, then let them do the only thing they know

"Der der der, let's put a V8 in it..."

Then apply a fat rear end with a big FORD circle to create a 50/50, 4,000LB that would run a 0-60 in 28 hours
Old 01-14-2007, 03:07 PM
  #7  
Shock and Awe
 
NoTears316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,871
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Keef
no, Ford is too dumb to understand a rotary engine...
um... Ford owns Mazda.
Old 01-14-2007, 03:38 PM
  #8  
C4 burns real good
iTrader: (4)
 
WantedTwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
ford owns 1/3 of mazda, so speaking in that logic, I own wal mart...
Old 01-14-2007, 03:44 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
RX8SaxMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Palmdale, CA
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You own 1/3 of Wal-Mart? You must be really f-ing rich.
Old 01-14-2007, 03:56 PM
  #10  
Shock and Awe
 
NoTears316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,871
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by WantedTwo
ford owns 1/3 of mazda, so speaking in that logic, I own wal mart...
Your logic fails
Old 01-14-2007, 04:20 PM
  #11  
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Razz1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cali
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
It all depends upon perception.

Live long and prosper.
Old 01-14-2007, 04:33 PM
  #12  
Sho'Nuff
 
Napboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My car before the RX8 was a '93 Probe GT. I loved that car and it was reliable as hell for me. I still see them on the road and get a lump in my throat.
Old 01-14-2007, 05:35 PM
  #13  
Registered
 
Design1stCode2nd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its duplication and threre isn't a need for it. Ford's performance car is teh Mustang in all ts iterations. If someone puts a good turbo four in the RX8 it would be a powerhouse except for a bit more weight. Do you honestly think a 300+hp and 3200lbs would not be good? (figuring the 4 would add about that much with associated plumbing.
Old 01-14-2007, 07:02 PM
  #14  
Registered
 
WhiteDealershipRice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: I am a leaf in the wind...
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Making it a Ford with something other than a rotary engine would negate most of the things that make the RX-8 a great car. adding a Turbo L4 (or even worse a V6, or, the horror, a V8 ) would make the car nose heavy, rob it of it's low polar moment, and take away the wonderfull exhaust note it has. Ford would also replace our sharp feeling electric power steering, with their discustingly over assisted hydraulic unit, and (as a cost cutting measure)replace the carbon driveshaft with a heavy steel unit. And although they have been moving in the right direction in the looks department... the new Mustang is the only model that I would say looks "right" on their current iteration. Their design department still has a lot of work to do.

BTW, the old Probe did look somewhat good, because it was really an MX-6 underneath.
Old 01-14-2007, 07:32 PM
  #15  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
alnielsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Posts: 12,255
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Napboy
My car before the RX8 was a '93 Probe GT. I loved that car and it was reliable as hell for me. I still see them on the road and get a lump in my throat.
That was one of the reasons I suggested to my son and he later purchaced a 94 Probe SE a couple of years ago. It's been a good car for him.
Old 01-14-2007, 08:44 PM
  #16  
Rotary Wanker
 
Ericok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Putting a rotary engine in Ford's lineup would hurt their Corporate Average Fuel Economy.
Old 01-15-2007, 07:38 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
andone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NoTears316
um... Ford owns Mazda.
yeah that might be true, though is that part of ford not the engineering part, but the ones that hold stocks from other companies....
so technically mazda is still its own company - has its own ideas, cars .....
its just 'owned' by ford...

if ford came out with such a car - in my opinion that would be a very stupid thing to do. then those two companies would compete each other even though they are owned by one !?
doesnt make sense to me.

i could imagine though that if ford would help mazda to further develop the rotary for better stats (such as mpg i.e.) we could expect a lot new stuff out of the rotary.

also i got to say that right now ford does have more important things to worry about. talking about number of sold cars going down and so on.... they first should spend money on getting their own cars to the future (like less gas consumption, alternative systems (like h2 and so on...))

sry for my english :D

so from me: Big NO NO to such a car.
Old 01-15-2007, 08:47 AM
  #18  
Registered
 
refugeefrompistons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 452
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
currently, ford is competing with mazda at some level. With the ranger and the b2000 aimed at the same market due to its similar design and same with the tribute and escape. These cars share the ford technical parts and design. Where the two companies separate is hard to tell. Certainly Mazda has been the more sporty of the two and developing more interesting innovations with the rotary but FORD HAS NO PURPOSE IN THE ROTARY DEPARTMENT.

Most companies still loathe the engine because the lack of research, only Mazda has done enough significant work to develop the rx7 and rx8. Personally i would love to see a piston rx8, juss to c how it would b received by the public. Preferably a I4 instead of a v8 but u cant deny the fact that ford has been making decent, if amazing sports cars in the recent years (Ford Gt, Cobra... too fat though).

Ford is very unlikely to revive the probe though, it has a significant portion of the sports car market with the mustang. And also they in the financial ****
Old 01-15-2007, 08:56 AM
  #19  
DaveCm
 
DaveCM203's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Central North Carolina
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I doubt Ford would do it. Using a rotory would steal thunder from Mazda. Also for it to sell as a Ford it would have to make a lot more power than it does now, or cost a lot less than the Mustang. Most Ford buyers care more about numbers than they do actual performance.
Old 01-15-2007, 10:37 AM
  #20  
Registered
 
mkaresh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Never considered this before. GM would try to sell a version as a Saab, without a doubt. But as a Ford? Bit much of a stretch. Too exotic. And too hard to make money on. Mazda must lose a ton on each one they sell: unique engine, unique platform, price under thirty...
Old 01-15-2007, 11:09 AM
  #21  
Rotary Wanker
 
Ericok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NoTears316
um... Ford owns Mazda.
Ford doesn't "own" Mazda just like you can't own anything by only having 1/3 of it. Ford has a "controlling interest" in Mazda because most of the remaining 2/3 of Mazda's stock that Ford doesn't own is either not voted or is split so that Ford carries a majority in making decisions. For example: if the remaining 2/3 of the stockholders split evenly on a decision, Ford ends up with 2/3 on it's side (the 1/3 it owns plus 1/3 from the other shareholders). Ford only needs 17% of the other shares to get over 50% of the vote. Both companies have probably decided that it's in their interests to operate this way.
Old 01-15-2007, 06:28 PM
  #22  
Registered
 
mkaresh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's a bit more formal than this: by Japanese law 33% is a controlling interest. The firms did not decide this, the Japanese government did, for all Japanese publicly traded corporations.
Old 01-15-2007, 06:37 PM
  #23  
Rotary Wanker
 
Ericok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mkaresh
It's a bit more formal than this: by Japanese law 33% is a controlling interest. The firms did not decide this, the Japanese government did, for all Japanese publicly traded corporations.
Well, that does make things a lot easier doesn't it.
Old 01-15-2007, 06:49 PM
  #24  
Jp7
Registered User
 
Jp7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
trust me that would NEVER happen. Ford and Mazda dont really have anything to do with eachother anymore....

Last edited by Jp7; 05-30-2011 at 12:59 AM.
Old 01-15-2007, 07:17 PM
  #25  
Registered Lunatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Tamas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 3,575
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by Napboy
My car before the RX8 was a '93 Probe GT. I loved that car and it was reliable as hell for me. I still see them on the road and get a lump in my throat.
Exactly my case (well, still not exactly because my PGT was a 94)

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Would you want to see a Ford RX8 called the Probe?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:55 PM.