If piston engines show low compression…
#1
Registered
Thread Starter
If piston engines show low compression…
…are they typically replaced? Or just repaired.
Seems the term "engine failure" – regarding the Renesis – is misleading. Mazda simply chooses to replace, rather than repair, their engines showing low compression. If failing a compression test constitutes "engine failure," I have a feeling millions of reciprocating engines have had engine failure as well.
Only they're repaired. Not replaced.
Seems the term "engine failure" – regarding the Renesis – is misleading. Mazda simply chooses to replace, rather than repair, their engines showing low compression. If failing a compression test constitutes "engine failure," I have a feeling millions of reciprocating engines have had engine failure as well.
Only they're repaired. Not replaced.
#3
Registered
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 239 Likes
on
109 Posts
Yes, "engine failure" is misleading when it comes to the rotary, and causes lots of confusion.
"Engine failure" in a piston engine is typically catastrophic, and up to that point the engine generally runs fine, where as you are far beyond technical 'failure' before you get to actual 'failure' with a rotary.
For piston engines, there are also many individual components that can be replaced without doing a full engine rebuild (such as valve springs, valves, etc...), where as any one failure with a rotary does mean an entire engine rebuild.
Low compression on a piston engine typically is from piston rings being worn/shifted, or the sleeves themselves being worn away. Basically the same relationship as our apex seals to housings. Only the wear dynamics are obviously far better for the piston rings than the apex seals. And yes, low compression piston engines usually are rebuilt, technically the same as rotary engines (your core when you get a replacement from a vendor is usually rebuilt), but you can rebuild just pieces much easier.
Example, my 99 Miata's failed piston ring motor could have been rebuilt for around $700 if I wished, with the price going up dramatically the more restoration and upgrading I wanted to do in the process. I ended up opting for a $1,250 lower mileage used engine instead.
Both are really handled the same, fundamentally, just the bias between rebuild vs replace is different, and the definition of 'failure' is a bit different.
"Engine failure" in a piston engine is typically catastrophic, and up to that point the engine generally runs fine, where as you are far beyond technical 'failure' before you get to actual 'failure' with a rotary.
For piston engines, there are also many individual components that can be replaced without doing a full engine rebuild (such as valve springs, valves, etc...), where as any one failure with a rotary does mean an entire engine rebuild.
Low compression on a piston engine typically is from piston rings being worn/shifted, or the sleeves themselves being worn away. Basically the same relationship as our apex seals to housings. Only the wear dynamics are obviously far better for the piston rings than the apex seals. And yes, low compression piston engines usually are rebuilt, technically the same as rotary engines (your core when you get a replacement from a vendor is usually rebuilt), but you can rebuild just pieces much easier.
Example, my 99 Miata's failed piston ring motor could have been rebuilt for around $700 if I wished, with the price going up dramatically the more restoration and upgrading I wanted to do in the process. I ended up opting for a $1,250 lower mileage used engine instead.
Both are really handled the same, fundamentally, just the bias between rebuild vs replace is different, and the definition of 'failure' is a bit different.
#4
Registered
When a piston engine loses compression, the cylinders can be honed or bored, and oversized rings (pistons, too, if bored) used. Can the equivalent of honing or boring be done on a rotary? Honing a piston engine and putting in new rings is a reasonable DIY.
Piston engines can also lose compression from valves going bad, in which case all that's done is a valve job. I've been through that a few times. Just pull the head, take it to the machine shop, pop it back on when they're done.
Ken
Piston engines can also lose compression from valves going bad, in which case all that's done is a valve job. I've been through that a few times. Just pull the head, take it to the machine shop, pop it back on when they're done.
Ken
#5
…are they typically replaced? Or just repaired.
Seems the term "engine failure" – regarding the Renesis – is misleading. Mazda simply chooses to replace, rather than repair, their engines showing low compression. If failing a compression test constitutes "engine failure," I have a feeling millions of reciprocating engines have had engine failure as well.
Only they're repaired. Not replaced.
Seems the term "engine failure" – regarding the Renesis – is misleading. Mazda simply chooses to replace, rather than repair, their engines showing low compression. If failing a compression test constitutes "engine failure," I have a feeling millions of reciprocating engines have had engine failure as well.
Only they're repaired. Not replaced.
actually the dealership i was at from 04-07, was replacing piston engines right and left, it was like a 30/1 ratio to the rotaries, but somehow the rotary gets the stigma and not ford. (we had a rash of V6 6's that died, and then the Cx7's blow up too, but that's after i left)
it's kind of funny actually, we are aware of the procedure the dealerships need to go thru to get Mazda to send them an engine, but with the piston engine cars, replacing the engine IS the diagnostic procedure!
#7
#8
#9
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cschoeps
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
0
08-06-2015 12:44 PM
dbarber
Series I Trouble Shooting
14
07-25-2015 01:34 PM