You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access
to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to start new topics, reply to conversations, privately message other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join RX8Club.com today!
i know the engine specs are essentially the same from the original RX8 to the new 09 facelifted version..but teh rear differential is different.
mazda claims the new model will have more throttle response and better low end acceleration.
Anyone care to estimate HOW much quicker? are we talking .1 or .2 quicker to 60.... and no real difference once you hit the 1/4 mile... or are we talking .5+ seconds quicker to 60?
i know the 8 is all about handling and the overall feel - but the ONE thing that I disliked about the 8 when i drove it was the lack of ooommph.. My dad has a 2000 boxster base model...which is only rated at 217hp... lower than the 8s rating of 232 (or is it 238?)... anyway... point is the boxster has more torque...and it just seemed/felt faster....
i wondered if anyone has ever taken the current RX8 and swapped rear ends to accomplish the same thing that mazda has done on the new models? I know from my searches on other cars, I've seen guys change rear end ratios on many other cars... even the S2k had some guys changing gears.... i just haven't seen than on the RX8.. soundsl ike it might be a nice way to just get better low end punch.
i'm not looking for a freeway high speed race car.. i want something to zip around at lower speeds,a nd enjoy on twisty roads..having a bit more snap at low speed, to pull out of corners would just up the fun factor I think...
This ad is not displayed to registered and logged-in members. Register your free account today and become a member on RX8Club.com!
itll prob be .1-.2 seconds faster with a little bit better torque. I could be wrong but I just dont see a differential making this car THAT much faster. Again, I could be wrong.
__________________ SOLD2004 RX8 Grand Touring K&N Typhoon V2 - Rotary Performance Gutted Cat (Midpipe) - 350Z Carbon Fiber Duct - TEIN Stechs - Tint - Tinted Fogs - Debadged - Black Painted Trunk - Greddy Shift Knob - Footwell Lights - Painted Interior Trim - JL/Rockford Fosgate Audio-MSD Dashhawk 81,XXX miles - Orig Engine (5W-20 User)
Replacement- 2011 Black Honda Civic Si Coupe
i know the engine specs are essentially the same from the original RX8 to the new 09 facelifted version..but teh rear differential is different.
mazda claims the new model will have more throttle response and better low end acceleration.
Anyone care to estimate HOW much quicker? are we talking .1 or .2 quicker to 60.... and no real difference once you hit the 1/4 mile... or are we talking .5+ seconds quicker to 60?
i know the 8 is all about handling and the overall feel - but the ONE thing that I disliked about the 8 when i drove it was the lack of ooommph.. My dad has a 2000 boxster base model...which is only rated at 217hp... lower than the 8s rating of 232 (or is it 238?)... anyway... point is the boxster has more torque...and it just seemed/felt faster....
i wondered if anyone has ever taken the current RX8 and swapped rear ends to accomplish the same thing that mazda has done on the new models? I know from my searches on other cars, I've seen guys change rear end ratios on many other cars... even the S2k had some guys changing gears.... i just haven't seen than on the RX8.. soundsl ike it might be a nice way to just get better low end punch.
i'm not looking for a freeway high speed race car.. i want something to zip around at lower speeds,a nd enjoy on twisty roads..having a bit more snap at low speed, to pull out of corners would just up the fun factor I think...
I believe the biggest change is going to be the final drive... changed from 4.444 to 4.777. That can be done aftermarket... I believe it's feed who offers that. There are also a few other tweaks that are less performance oriented... Also changed appearance so if that matters a lot, you'll want to observe those differences as well.
If it's only the few small things such as the final drive... you'd be just as good buying a used 8 and putting in the changes yourself I think
edit: I cant really say any numbers for sure, but the way I've heard it... you'll notice the difference when you put them side by side, but aside from that it wont be that noticeable
The biggest difference is the new OMP and additional oil injection ports. Hopefully this will solve the apex seal wear issues and remove the need to premix.
__________________ -Co-founding Tyrant
2004 VR 6MT GT RB flywheel, ACT clutch, Autometer Gauges in Lotek Gauge Pod, Komodo suede shift boot, RB HT800 brake pads, ATE superblue DOT4 brake fluid, mazdatrix SS brake lines, Now on Swift Sport Mach Springs , Koni Sport Shocks, Racing Beat front and rear swaybars with RB front endlinks. Axial Flow Brake Master Cylinder Brace!! Mazsport Ignition!! COBB/MM AP
The biggest difference is the new OMP and additional oil injection ports. Hopefully this will solve the apex seal wear issues and remove the need to premix.
yeah... but that goes more to reliability than speed. Though it will help the engine run better. As for straight acceleration, I think the biggest change is the 4.777
True, it may feel different on an MT. I think most of us that have had it done are pretty happy with it. I'm just saying don't expect FI-like acceleration gains. It does make the car more responsive and quicker off the line.
__________________
The Fleet:
05 RX-8 GT AT (many mods)
92 Miata MT (stock)
05 Acura TL AT (stock)
13 CX-5 GT (stock)
My opinion is that it will be quicker off the line but down a 1/4 mile it will be the same or slower considering now you need to shift to 4th to finish the 1/4 since the gearing is shorter.
__________________
can you guess what cars are in the WINGMEN?
My opinion is that it will be quicker off the line but down a 1/4 mile it will be the same or slower considering now you need to shift to 4th to finish the 1/4 since the gearing is shorter.
you have to shift to 4th in the current rx8 as it stands. last 50 feet. really annoying.
Just resurrecting to see if anyone has any updated thoughts on this. From the smattering of 2009 reviews, the new ratio hasn't really seem to done much. C&D tested an 09 R3 at 0-60 in 6.3 and 1/4 in 14.9 at 94MPH.
Can the 09's reach 60 in 2nd gear?
Last edited by CarAndDriver; 03-12-2009 at 01:38 PM.
Location: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Posts: 11,618
They lowered the gear ratio, but they also went from a 18" wheel to a 19" wheel. The taller wheel should just about negate the gear change.
__________________ Don't try this at home. It could be dangerous. I have years of experience.
Emissions and fuel economy haven't exactly been areas of strength for past rotary power plants, but absolutely no one with a soul has ever cared. - Autoweek
Rotary History:1982 RX7 GS, 1985 RX7 GSL-SE, 2004 RX8 Sport-Continuous Rotary Owner since 1985
Racing History:SCCA Solo II 1979-1986, Skip Barber Comp School 1983, SCCA Club Racing 1987-1993, 2004-2011 Track Days
04-08: gradual, slow at first, but really gets you there after 5k
power is near the end (obviously) i feel like there is a bit more power
09: a bit more umph before 5k, the umph after 5k is there, but goes by faster, feels like i have a shortened red line
power is a bit more spread out, but not as much
all in all, they average out to be the same. but i will say this, the 0-60 will be faster in the 09. for some reason i could launch so much better in the 09, than in my 40th.
09 gets the 0-60. 04-08 gets the 1/4
__________________
someone should make this mod:
for the manual shifter, have the silver part with the h pattern and numbers, slide around, and reveal a button....
Well, if $ isnt a big issue and ur cool with the facelift, there is no reason not to get the R3. As much as i love the S1 styling and my own car, if the oppurtunity presented itself to replace mine with an R3 at no to minimal cost, i would do it even though i like the looks of the S1 better (though a tear or two would be shed). I mean its the newest and latest thing, less of the "kinks" of the earlier models with new improvements that, though not much in accerelation difference, ARE improvements and make for an all around better RX-8.
__________________
83 RX-7 GSL---SOLD
04 RX-8
"Is better to be thought an idiot than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."
Last edited by jones75254; 03-13-2009 at 04:50 AM.
Anyone care to estimate HOW much quicker? are we talking .1 or .2 quicker to 60.... and no real difference once you hit the 1/4 mile... or are we talking .5+ seconds quicker to 60?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renesis07
itll prob be .1-.2 seconds faster with a little bit better torque.
Quote:
Originally Posted by always.anthony
09 gets the 0-60.
At least a couple of tests have shown that the '09 has slower 0-60 times. I saw one guy said he could get to 60 in 2nd gear but most say you now need to shift into 3rd and that's why those times are slower. But there have also been reports of better lap times.
__________________
Thanks, Robrecht!
"When all is said and done, it's possible that Mazda will find a few more ponies in there than they've been alluding to. I would imagine that after the faux-pas over horsepower with the 2001 NB8B Miata, Mazda is being conservative on power output announcements." - bwob, 2/2/02
It's about the driver not the car. I'll toast your Dads Boxter in no time. I have an 04 with the RB flash, RB exhaust, RB intake, and catback. The Boxter is not that fast. Unless there is an AMG, M4 or a shelby label I dont worry. Learn how to drive the rotary.
At least a couple of tests have shown that the '09 has slower 0-60 times. I saw one guy said he could get to 60 in 2nd gear but most say you now need to shift into 3rd and that's why those times are slower. But there have also been reports of better lap times.
09 rx8: 2nd tops out at 60 or 61, past 9k though, you can get it to 60 in 2nd gear, FOR SURE, no questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmazda
It's about the driver not the car. I'll toast your Dads Boxter in no time. I have an 04 with the RB flash, RB exhaust, RB intake, and catback. The Boxter is not that fast. Unless there is an AMG, M4 or a shelby label I dont worry. Learn how to drive the rotary.
Dmazda
what if his dad could toast you?
__________________
someone should make this mod:
for the manual shifter, have the silver part with the h pattern and numbers, slide around, and reveal a button....
The new 2009 is slower. Check out road and Track and the 1/4 mile postings on the net.
That actually depends on which article you read and are you only lookin at the 1/4? C&D latest comparison had the R3 run 6.3 to 60 and a 14.9 quarter. I believe Road and Track had it at 6.3 to 60 as well.
What most people who aren't launching should really look at is the 5-60 time, where you floor it after already going. In that latest CD comparison, the street start was 7.2 seconds. Go all the way back to the first ever test CD did with the 8 against the g35 coupe and mustang back in 2003. The street start for that 8 was 7.5 seconds to 60.
09 rx8: 2nd tops out at 60 or 61, past 9k though, you can get it to 60 in 2nd gear, FOR SURE, no questions
Are you talking about actual speed or speed indicated on the speedometer?
__________________
Thanks, Robrecht!
"When all is said and done, it's possible that Mazda will find a few more ponies in there than they've been alluding to. I would imagine that after the faux-pas over horsepower with the 2001 NB8B Miata, Mazda is being conservative on power output announcements." - bwob, 2/2/02
(5W-20 User)
Linear Mode
