Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

2004 vs. 2005

Old 03-03-2006, 10:41 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Jayd41's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Appleton
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 vs. 2005

I was just looking at my newest consumer reports magazine and they were rating used car reliability and for some reason the 2005 RX-8 scored MUCH higher than the 2004 RX-8. They listed the 2004 as being problematic with the engine and ignition and a couple other areas.
I am looking to pick up an RX-8 within the next week or so and was wondering if someone could shed some more light on this issue for me. I searched the forums and couldn't find any related threads so hopefully someone has some help for me.
Thanks!
Old 03-03-2006, 10:44 PM
  #2  
Extraordinary Engineering
 
DarkBrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Burls On
Posts: 4,733
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Mazda addressed the issues with ECU flashes and TSBs. Probably best to buy late 2004 or a 2005.
Old 03-04-2006, 10:41 PM
  #3  
'04 MT RX8/71 351C Mach1
 
glassetcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Waukesha, WI
Posts: 460
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
IMO, most of the first evaluations were due to early production problems that were corrected with later "flash" computer corrections. My 06/03 build "04 RX-8", with current updates, has had virtually no problems.

Zoom, Zoom!
Old 03-04-2006, 10:58 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
snap-on's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder if they take the ability of the dealers into the number. Some of the small/new dealers had never even seen a rotary engine.
Old 10-06-2006, 10:47 PM
  #5  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
BoosTED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 2,896
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The only difference between the two years is adding the snowflake (whitewater) pearl paint color and the switchblade style key. Other than that the cars are made of the same material.

Shinka has a couple additions for appearance and a little bit of suspension upgrade.
Old 10-06-2006, 11:12 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
sunilseru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
isn't this a really old thread?
Old 10-06-2006, 11:20 PM
  #7  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
BoosTED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 2,896
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Under a year old...

Old 10-07-2006, 08:09 AM
  #8  
Registered
 
Raptor75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
By late 05 most of the teething bugs had been worked out. This means nothing you will see in specs but numerous redesigns to small items that were causing problems. Some of them the dealers will correct others they will not. Go late 05 if you can.
Old 10-07-2006, 08:54 AM
  #9  
Registered
 
New Yorker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,319
Received 58 Likes on 51 Posts
Yup, just typical first-year teething problems—happens all the time. Many people won't buy a car the first year it comes out.

FYI, there's no secret as to how Consumer Reports does their reliability ratings. Every year they mail out surveys to their subscribers—tens of thousands of people—who then rate their car in each category (Ignition, Body, Brakes, Electrical, Engine, etc.). CR then just tallies up the results.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TeslaMSI
New Member Forum
11
12-10-2015 01:10 AM
Steve Dallas
RX-8 Racing
10
10-07-2015 10:30 AM
vapor2
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
3
09-21-2015 01:36 AM
vapor2
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
0
09-08-2015 08:27 PM
Tsurugi
New Member Forum
0
09-07-2015 08:27 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 2004 vs. 2005



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:14 AM.