Kickers V6 swap thread
#76
Registered
Thread Starter
I know of that engine as well as the VQ30 and VQ35, also good engines. The VQ30 would be easy to find from the Maxima. I have an SR20 sitting in the garage with a set of DET rods and squirters. It was intended to be built to replace the engine in my Sentra but I sold the car. SRS?
#77
Un-Registered User
If you want a good v6, you have the VQ30DETT, more power than that piece of **** Isuzu engine.
You can get good horsepower and great torque from them. Would be my choice
If you have heaps of money though, why not get the supercharged 3.2 v6 out of the C32 AMG?
You can get good horsepower and great torque from them. Would be my choice
If you have heaps of money though, why not get the supercharged 3.2 v6 out of the C32 AMG?
#78
Registered
Thread Starter
Money isn't endless.
Here's one pic of a VQ30DETT iron block from this page --> Engine Tech, Building the Nissan VG30DETT part 1
In the second photo, it looks like a 2pc aluminum block. That sump could cause clearance problems. From here --> altimaxima.org.au :: altimas and maximas australia & new zealand • View topic - Nissan Skyline ER34: VQ30DETT
Third photo is the Isuzu bottom end. 6 bolt mains with a main girdle containing the oil rail. You can't tell me that's not strong. There's 24 bolts in total to hold 4 main caps.
Last edited by kickerfox; 12-25-2012 at 05:41 PM.
#80
Registered
Thread Starter
EDIT- Just dawned on me. The 3.5L has a stroked crank and piston pin is 4.0132" higher to compensate. The rods are the same part number. A 3.2L standard crank with a 150mm rod on the 3.5L piston should put the deck height at .0132" lower then normal. That's fine. In that case, Mitsubishi 4G63 uses a 150mm rod. I wonder what the BE and pin size is. How does a short rod vs. longer rod play into engine performance/rpm?
Last edited by kickerfox; 12-25-2012 at 06:15 PM.
#81
Registered
Thread Starter
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDfazp0u4CA
In case anyone wanted to know what this engine sounds like bouncing off the rev limit. Not exactly the smoothest sounding engine on the planet that's for sure.
In case anyone wanted to know what this engine sounds like bouncing off the rev limit. Not exactly the smoothest sounding engine on the planet that's for sure.
#83
What engine was in the crossfire srt6? Front engine, rwd, compact and potent. Sounded great to drive and some decent aftermarket options
Dyno. This would be nice
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iW4EeRX...eature=related
Dyno. This would be nice
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iW4EeRX...eature=related
Last edited by Unoriginalusername; 12-25-2012 at 09:38 PM.
#84
Registered
Thread Starter
What engine was in the crossfire srt6? Front engine, rwd, compact and potent. Sounded great to drive and some decent aftermarket options
Dyno. This would be nice
SRT-6 Dyno 458hp - YouTube
Dyno. This would be nice
SRT-6 Dyno 458hp - YouTube
Slidin8 - I'm suprised to get that reaction out of you. lol Here's another dyno run of that engine doing 606.8kw (813.7hp). There has to be SOME strength to it to be pushing those kinds of numbers even if it is custom built. The smoke at the end was stated to be an injector o-ring failure. I emailed the builder. I'm wondering what internals they used. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5tE55DAFKo
Last edited by kickerfox; 12-25-2012 at 10:16 PM.
#85
Un-Registered User
Your numbers are slightly off,
M112 E32 N/A 224hp 232 ft/lbs
M112 E32 S/C 354hp 332ft/lbs (14.5psi)
on paper, your isuzu engine has more power, but this is a better engine. plus its forged
I drive a C320 often, and it pulls ******* hard and is so smooth
M112 E32 N/A 224hp 232 ft/lbs
M112 E32 S/C 354hp 332ft/lbs (14.5psi)
on paper, your isuzu engine has more power, but this is a better engine. plus its forged
I drive a C320 often, and it pulls ******* hard and is so smooth
#86
Registered
Thread Starter
The availability of it is very good. '92-04 in all. '92-97 was the shorter decked block with the big intake ports. I'm sure they would bolt on the tall deck block (same head gaskets) but I'd need a different timing belt. Add the 3.5L stroked crank and hodge-podge some frankenstein engine.
#88
I divide by zero
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#91
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
some people have nothing better to do than to waste time and money, remember the Starquest/Renesis clusterf-ck? ... https://www.rx8club.com/se-sale-want...things-238222/
#92
Registered
Thread Starter
This is how my budjet turbo mx-5 turned out. Nothing was part of a kit. It's all hand made except for the turbo manifold. Note the Toyota coil-over-plugs. This was the first Miata to have that conversion done (I developed it) and it ran sequential ign with per-cylinder trims. FMIC was from an EVO. Even the turbo itself was a Saab 900 T3 turbine with an IH T4 compressor from the truck stop. It ran speed density using an '89 GM MAP sensor. A good eye will see it. (rightside firewall). Clutch was an MX-6 disk under a Greddy PP (more contact area then MX-5).
I don't have problems getting things done and getting them done cheap and reliable as well. That MX-5 had 162k on it before I boosted it. It was my first turbo build and my first time using standalone management and ran my own DIY street tune. I ran 15psi on that old engine and never blew it up over 4 years. I must have SOME ability here, no?
I don't have problems getting things done and getting them done cheap and reliable as well. That MX-5 had 162k on it before I boosted it. It was my first turbo build and my first time using standalone management and ran my own DIY street tune. I ran 15psi on that old engine and never blew it up over 4 years. I must have SOME ability here, no?
#94
Registered
Thread Starter
I never had a problem with it getting wet. I didn't plan my drives during storms but I've been caught in the rain many times. FYI that dropped my intake temps by a great amount. Maybe 10~20c? It's been awhile but it was a huge improvement.
Last edited by kickerfox; 12-26-2012 at 01:27 PM.
#95
Best quote ever (if your mind is impure)
#98
Registered
Thread Starter
I didn't get to the yards today but I had a chance to call and verify that they did have the engine.
Pics of a supercharged Isuzu 3.5L v6 turning a huge prop. Rated at 350hp (9.1:1cr 3.5L). Someone has faith in that engine. Complete engine (dry) including reduction and supercharger = 352.74lb(160kg). Prop reduction weight = 66.14lb (30KG). Difference = 286.6lb(130kg). So Isuzu 3.5L v6 engine+SC=286.6lb for 350hp. Not too bad. I will assume that's with the alternator and starter to be sold as a complete engine for aircraft use. Anyone here flying customs who can verify?
Pics of a supercharged Isuzu 3.5L v6 turning a huge prop. Rated at 350hp (9.1:1cr 3.5L). Someone has faith in that engine. Complete engine (dry) including reduction and supercharger = 352.74lb(160kg). Prop reduction weight = 66.14lb (30KG). Difference = 286.6lb(130kg). So Isuzu 3.5L v6 engine+SC=286.6lb for 350hp. Not too bad. I will assume that's with the alternator and starter to be sold as a complete engine for aircraft use. Anyone here flying customs who can verify?
Last edited by kickerfox; 12-26-2012 at 05:18 PM.