Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

video: direct comparison of RX-8 against BMW 135i turbo coupe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-10-2008, 07:31 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
rotaryfanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow video: direct comparison of RX-8 against BMW 135i turbo coupe

http://www.1addicts.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4242

Interesting direct comparison.
rotaryfanatic is offline  
Old 02-10-2008, 08:17 PM
  #2  
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
mysql101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 8,625
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
not much of a comparison.

I have a german friend.

He said:

The quote is "The rx8 has no chance"

madza is fun but harder to handle

The RX-8 is ... playful.

gas milage is unaccetable on both cars they say

only 2K euro more for the bmw
It looks like the MSRP is around 35k for the bmw. The RX-8 msrp is around 27k. So 8k best case. Knowing we can get a 8 for less than MSRP, and the BMW is unlikely to be stripped down, the difference is likely more significant.

Unfortunately, stock to stock, we're looking at a 300 hp car with 290 tq vs a 230 hp car with 140 tq. Not going to be shocking which one wins.
mysql101 is offline  
Old 02-10-2008, 09:14 PM
  #3  
Registered RX-8 User
 
EdwardsB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: PA/MD
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
isn't the bmw a turbo 6? if so what would you expect from a larger displacement FI car

Take the money you save and go to mazsport and buy a turbo kit for your 8
EdwardsB is offline  
Old 02-10-2008, 09:15 PM
  #4  
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
mysql101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 8,625
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
yep.... but at that point the bmw has a warranty and the 8 wouldn't, so that would not be a fair comparison either.
mysql101 is offline  
Old 02-10-2008, 09:17 PM
  #5  
Registered RX-8 User
 
EdwardsB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: PA/MD
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ah true I didnt think of that, oh well im happy with my 8 anyway
EdwardsB is offline  
Old 02-10-2008, 09:26 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
arcX-8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They liked the 8's acceleration at high rpms. They didn't like that the trunk needs to be opened with the key. I guess they didn't take the time to find out about the dash button - assuming that's standard on euro spec cars. They did like the 8's details better but said that the BMW was a better package. Closing statement was:"The BMW won our hearts, but it was also the better car objectively speaking." Comparing similar sized cars with a 75 hp difference seems counterproductive. I thought the tone of the whole thing was to make the BMW look better no matter what. Just my subjective opinion though. I would like to see the 215hp 199tq 135 compared to the 8, and I actually like BMWs. I would never buy one though until they make some progress in quality, and that is speaking from personal experience.
arcX-8 is offline  
Old 02-10-2008, 09:38 PM
  #7  
Registered RX-8 User
 
EdwardsB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: PA/MD
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They are good cars but I only ever really liked the m3 or m5...don't care for the m6 styling and there are 3 series everywhere.
EdwardsB is offline  
Old 02-10-2008, 11:26 PM
  #8  
Man, We Ain't Found Sh*t!
 
bigireland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 318
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
okayokayokay.. the 135 is faster, handles better(but that has to be by the slightest of margins) and consumes less fuel.. they forgot one thing though.. that car next to the rx-8 looks like rosie o'donnell next to halley berry.. watch the video again.. i'm right
bigireland is offline  
Old 02-10-2008, 11:49 PM
  #9  
Now watch me yuuuuaaaaaa!
 
superdon2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
biased germans! they picked an 8 to bully a jdm

should have compared that lunchbox with evo X as they have the same hp and msrp.
superdon2 is offline  
Old 02-11-2008, 12:00 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Phade2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SF Bay Area / San Diego
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bigireland
okayokayokay.. the 135 is faster, handles better(but that has to be by the slightest of margins) and consumes less fuel.. they forgot one thing though.. that car next to the rx-8 looks like rosie o'donnell next to halley berry.. watch the video again.. i'm right
It does have that pot belly pig profile. No doubt it's a great performer, but in a couple years it'll be just as common as an accord.
Phade2 is offline  
Old 02-11-2008, 12:15 AM
  #11  
Man, We Ain't Found Sh*t!
 
bigireland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 318
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
also when they were driving the rx-8, upon shifting to 2nd, the driver said "oh" and when he shifted to 3rd, finished it with "wow".. doesn't matter what language you speak..
bigireland is offline  
Old 02-11-2008, 11:21 AM
  #12  
Grand Chancellor
 
delhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Home of the NIMBYs
Posts: 2,730
Received 58 Likes on 47 Posts
So a 3500+lb car handles better than a 3000+lb car? Right..... I call biased.
delhi is offline  
Old 02-11-2008, 12:49 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
playdoh43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
wight isnt everything you know? otherwise toyota yarises would be running circles around the rx8
playdoh43 is offline  
Old 02-11-2008, 12:52 PM
  #14  
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
mysql101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 8,625
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by playdoh43
wight isnt everything you know? otherwise toyota yarises would be running circles around the rx8
weight is huge. it's the reason why the lotus is regarded as a fast car, even though it barely has 200 hp.
mysql101 is offline  
Old 02-11-2008, 12:52 PM
  #15  
Registered
 
9291150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Georgetown
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Speaking as someone who picked the 8 over a 330 with sport package, I can't see how the new 1 would handle better. In the end it was the opinion of 2 guys, but the 1 looks promising. The rear seat would keep it out of consideration for me; otherwise BM seems to be getting back to its roots with the 1.

Surprised the acceleration contest wasn't even worse. they obviously started both cars just off idle with no wheel slippage, something that wouldn't really affect the 135 but kills the 8.
9291150 is offline  
Old 02-11-2008, 12:57 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
playdoh43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mysql101
weight is huge. it's the reason why the lotus is regarded as a fast car, even though it barely has 200 hp.
weight is surely a factor but not everything. a lot of factors together contribute to the Elise' great handling and overall performance. Lotus is also known for its suspension tuning and weight balance/chasis engineering. Lotus designed the suspension for the GT-R, which has been proclaimed to handle better than a lot of lighter cars.
playdoh43 is offline  
Old 02-11-2008, 01:00 PM
  #17  
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
mysql101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 8,625
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
weight will play a greater role than just about anything else. Tweaking the suspension is something that you have to do anyway, and modify based on what track you're racing on.
mysql101 is offline  
Old 02-11-2008, 01:02 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
playdoh43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm not denying that weight plays a big part when it comes to handling, but saying a statement like:,

"So a 3500+lb car handles better than a 3000+lb car? Right..... " is short sighted.

otherwise, like i said a yaris should be running circles around the rx8, if weight alone determines how well a car handles
playdoh43 is offline  
Old 02-11-2008, 02:02 PM
  #19  
Grand Chancellor
 
delhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Home of the NIMBYs
Posts: 2,730
Received 58 Likes on 47 Posts
You missed the point that both cars are sports tuned to handle. The Yaris is not. Using Yaris example is foolish. Atleast try the MX-5. Oh wait, the mx-5 does handle well.
delhi is offline  
Old 02-11-2008, 02:41 PM
  #20  
幹他媽!
 
Detrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Gabriel Valley, CA
Posts: 2,078
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
to me, the 1 series is better if you don't mind driving around in a car that looks like a square loaf of bread...

plus, if u add on options, the 135i hits $45k EASILY, not to mention tax & licensing puts it at almost $50k. fully-loaded, the 8 maxes out at $35k. not even in the same ball park or price range, if u ask me.

apples to oranges.
Detrich is offline  
Old 02-11-2008, 04:01 PM
  #21  
Banned
 
Startl_Respons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the hive
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by playdoh43
I'm not denying that weight plays a big part when it comes to handling, but saying a statement like:,

"So a 3500+lb car handles better than a 3000+lb car? Right..... " is short sighted.

otherwise, like i said a yaris should be running circles around the rx8, if weight alone determines how well a car handles
Time for you to quit.
Startl_Respons is offline  
Old 02-11-2008, 04:31 PM
  #22  
Wheels, not rims!!
iTrader: (8)
 
SayNoToPistons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: LA
Posts: 6,527
Received 67 Likes on 56 Posts
Ouch... Now let's wait for a less biased comparison. Car & Driver perhaps?
SayNoToPistons is offline  
Old 02-11-2008, 04:46 PM
  #23  
Grand Chancellor
 
delhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Home of the NIMBYs
Posts: 2,730
Received 58 Likes on 47 Posts
Where is John Davis?!!!
delhi is offline  
Old 02-11-2008, 07:48 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
playdoh43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by delhi
You missed the point that both cars are sports tuned to handle. The Yaris is not. Using Yaris example is foolish. Atleast try the MX-5. Oh wait, the mx-5 does handle well.
ok, then your statement basically agrees that weight isnt everything, suspension tuning and other factors are also big contributors... yaris vs mx5 is a good example of relatively same weight yet other characteristics makes big difference in handling.


and just out of curiousity, to you, since both the rx8 and mx-5 are "sports tuned to handle." And since the mx-5 is lighter, does it handle better than the rx8?

Last edited by playdoh43; 02-11-2008 at 07:55 PM.
playdoh43 is offline  
Old 02-11-2008, 08:05 PM
  #25  
Registered
 
NaarLeven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
people on that forum suprisingly not the usual 8 haters.

Quite the mature group. Go on youtube to find countless RX8 IS SLOW AS **** THAT CAR SUCKS ect..
NaarLeven is offline  


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: video: direct comparison of RX-8 against BMW 135i turbo coupe



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:44 AM.