Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Is SKYACTIV-VEHICLE DYNAMICS with G-Vectoring Control killing gas mileage?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-18-2016, 08:34 AM
  #1  
Rockie Mountain Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Bladecutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,601
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
Is SKYACTIV-VEHICLE DYNAMICS with G-Vectoring Control killing gas mileage?

I have a question for you guys in the know that I haven't seen answered anywhere.

I have noticed that the new Mazda 3 and Mazda 6 that were released with the SKYACTIV-VEHICLE DYNAMICS with G-Vectoring Control have shown a large decrease in fuel mileage.

Examples:

2016 Mazda 6 Grand Touring:
City - 28 mpg
Highway - 40 mpg
Combined - 33 mpg

2017 Mazda 6 Grand Touring:
City - 27 mpg
Highway - 35 mpg
Combined - 31 mpg

2016 Mazda 6 Touring:
City - 26 mpg
Highway - 37 mpg
Combined - 31 mpg

2017 Mazda 6 Touring:
City - 26 mpg
Highway - 35 mpg
Combined - 30 mpg

2016 Mazda 3 Sport Sedan (2.0):
City - 30 mpg
Highway - 41 mpg
Combined - 35 mpg

2017 Mazda 3 Sport Sedan (2.0):
City - 28 mpg
Highway - 37 mpg
Combined - 32 mpg

So, anyone know what's going on?
The cars haven't gained weight, hp, or changed gearing in any way that I can see, but their fantastic fuel mileage has dropped noticeably.

BC.
Old 11-18-2016, 08:50 AM
  #2  
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Mazmart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,792
Received 63 Likes on 32 Posts
That's weird. Are these figures all from Mazda or EPA?

Paul
Old 11-18-2016, 03:57 PM
  #3  
Modulated Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
dannobre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Smallville
Posts: 13,718
Received 334 Likes on 289 Posts
I think I remember there were big changes in the way they tested mpg...........so the #'s changed to reflect that

more real world #'s likely
Old 11-18-2016, 05:48 PM
  #4  
What am I doing here?
 
NotAPreppie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 2017 Miata RF Launch Edition
Posts: 3,606
Received 649 Likes on 510 Posts
Originally Posted by dannobre
I think I remember there were big changes in the way they tested mpg...........so the #'s changed to reflect that

more real world #'s likely
Yes:
https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ratings.shtml
Old 11-21-2016, 03:29 PM
  #5  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
change in testing methodology. different test = different answers
Old 11-22-2016, 08:05 AM
  #6  
Rockie Mountain Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Bladecutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,601
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
Thanks guys.
I just couldn't understand why the numbers were so different between 16 and 17.
It not like it says it anywhere, at all.

BC.
Old 11-23-2016, 10:51 AM
  #7  
Super Moderator
 
ASH8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,861
Received 316 Likes on 225 Posts
no, and yes to different testing method.



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:04 AM.