Is SKYACTIV-VEHICLE DYNAMICS with G-Vectoring Control killing gas mileage?
#1
Rockie Mountain Newbie
Thread Starter
Is SKYACTIV-VEHICLE DYNAMICS with G-Vectoring Control killing gas mileage?
I have a question for you guys in the know that I haven't seen answered anywhere.
I have noticed that the new Mazda 3 and Mazda 6 that were released with the SKYACTIV-VEHICLE DYNAMICS with G-Vectoring Control have shown a large decrease in fuel mileage.
Examples:
2016 Mazda 6 Grand Touring:
City - 28 mpg
Highway - 40 mpg
Combined - 33 mpg
2017 Mazda 6 Grand Touring:
City - 27 mpg
Highway - 35 mpg
Combined - 31 mpg
2016 Mazda 6 Touring:
City - 26 mpg
Highway - 37 mpg
Combined - 31 mpg
2017 Mazda 6 Touring:
City - 26 mpg
Highway - 35 mpg
Combined - 30 mpg
2016 Mazda 3 Sport Sedan (2.0):
City - 30 mpg
Highway - 41 mpg
Combined - 35 mpg
2017 Mazda 3 Sport Sedan (2.0):
City - 28 mpg
Highway - 37 mpg
Combined - 32 mpg
So, anyone know what's going on?
The cars haven't gained weight, hp, or changed gearing in any way that I can see, but their fantastic fuel mileage has dropped noticeably.
BC.
I have noticed that the new Mazda 3 and Mazda 6 that were released with the SKYACTIV-VEHICLE DYNAMICS with G-Vectoring Control have shown a large decrease in fuel mileage.
Examples:
2016 Mazda 6 Grand Touring:
City - 28 mpg
Highway - 40 mpg
Combined - 33 mpg
2017 Mazda 6 Grand Touring:
City - 27 mpg
Highway - 35 mpg
Combined - 31 mpg
2016 Mazda 6 Touring:
City - 26 mpg
Highway - 37 mpg
Combined - 31 mpg
2017 Mazda 6 Touring:
City - 26 mpg
Highway - 35 mpg
Combined - 30 mpg
2016 Mazda 3 Sport Sedan (2.0):
City - 30 mpg
Highway - 41 mpg
Combined - 35 mpg
2017 Mazda 3 Sport Sedan (2.0):
City - 28 mpg
Highway - 37 mpg
Combined - 32 mpg
So, anyone know what's going on?
The cars haven't gained weight, hp, or changed gearing in any way that I can see, but their fantastic fuel mileage has dropped noticeably.
BC.
#4
What am I doing here?
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 2017 Miata RF Launch Edition
Posts: 3,606
Received 649 Likes
on
510 Posts
#6
Rockie Mountain Newbie
Thread Starter
Thanks guys.
I just couldn't understand why the numbers were so different between 16 and 17.
It not like it says it anywhere, at all.
BC.
I just couldn't understand why the numbers were so different between 16 and 17.
It not like it says it anywhere, at all.
BC.
#7
Super Moderator
no, and yes to different testing method.