C63 v Audi RS4 v M3
10-31-2007, 08:38 AM
#1
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Georgetown
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C63 v Audi RS4 v M3
http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...08-bmw-m3.html
Holy ****! 3.9 seconds 0-60, quarters in the 12's...but 4000 pound cars and 10mpg. The bar has been really raised again, but at too great a cost? Anyways, the BM would be my choice, the Audi a close 2nd.
This bar raising...just got a lesson in it; a friend just picked up a new G35 and he can now pull on me nicely, which wasn't the case with his last G35.
Holy ****! 3.9 seconds 0-60, quarters in the 12's...but 4000 pound cars and 10mpg. The bar has been really raised again, but at too great a cost? Anyways, the BM would be my choice, the Audi a close 2nd.
This bar raising...just got a lesson in it; a friend just picked up a new G35 and he can now pull on me nicely, which wasn't the case with his last G35.
10-31-2007, 12:11 PM
#2
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Owings Mills, near Baltimore MD
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm surprised. MB's are usually castrated in car mag's for being numb and lifeless, and MB usually jsut throws power at it. I've never driven a MB that I enjoyed, they have all been such bad driver's cars. It appears that hey tried a little harder this time.
11-01-2007, 09:51 PM
#4
It's a Cavalier
What are you saying? That's absolutely impossible. That car weighs 3814lbs. 3814 lbs!!!!! If you so much as try to turn it, the tires buckle and peel off the rims, and it instantly smashes into a wall and explodes. Only cars that weigh < 3100lbs are allowed to turn.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pdxhak
General Automotive
7
09-22-2015 07:39 AM