Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

20 Most Dangerous Vehicles on the Road today.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-29-2008, 11:47 AM
  #1  
The devil made me do it
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
DeViLbOi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
20 Most Dangerous Vehicles on the Road today.

An interesting story came up over on Digg today about the most dangerous vehicles on the road and they had an interesting quote to start the article.

"For example, the Nissan 350Z has a death rate that's about double that of the average sports car."
No wonder we all passed on that thing. :P

For the full article, go HERE.
Old 03-29-2008, 12:01 PM
  #2  
Has the whole shit.
 
Rhawb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some of those ratings don't make sense...It seems like some of the cars fared really well, but since they weren't 5-stars across the board, they were "dangerous."
Old 03-29-2008, 12:08 PM
  #3  
i've lost my mind
 
IcarusX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I noticed the 8 isnt on there congrats to us!!!
Old 03-29-2008, 12:10 PM
  #4  
The devil made me do it
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
DeViLbOi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
It was weird...the 350z didn't even make the top 20 so I don't know how it got singled out in the story.
Old 03-29-2008, 12:11 PM
  #5  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
alnielsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Posts: 12,255
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
They start the article talking about the Z. It isn't even in their worst 20. I find that misleading.
Old 03-29-2008, 12:46 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
trash259's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DeViLbOi
It was weird...the 350z didn't even make the top 20 so I don't know how it got singled out in the story.
here:

"...the 350Z is part of a group of vehicles that tends to be driven by younger, less experienced or riskier drivers, and stands out for having high death rates, through no particular fault of the car."
Old 03-29-2008, 12:52 PM
  #7  
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Jedi54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Dark Side
Posts: 22,394
Received 2,630 Likes on 1,880 Posts
^^^ then why even mention the Z?
Old 03-29-2008, 01:02 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
8 Maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Aki City, Japan
Posts: 3,814
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm not sure I follow some of those... I thought the s2000 was rather good on safety... oh well. We didnt make it on the list, so that's good.
Old 03-29-2008, 01:13 PM
  #9  
♥'s racing beat
 
Batman&TheBatmobile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: jersey, BITCH
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
except for the s2k and the 3, theyre mostly little ugly cars that i would never even consider. rx-8: 1. uglycars: 0
Old 03-29-2008, 01:37 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
trash259's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jedi54
^^^ then why even mention the Z?
I dont know....maybe they hate the z....their whole chart is stupid anyways.

Last edited by trash259; 03-29-2008 at 01:42 PM.
Old 03-29-2008, 01:52 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
8 Maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Aki City, Japan
Posts: 3,814
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think they were just trying to make it more apparent that they factored in driver error, and that it wasnt an error from the assumption of what caused some statistics
Old 03-29-2008, 01:58 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
kartweb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety is an ad-hoc agency with absolutely zero credibility.

Notice the same message in the top 20 list - no side airbags standard.

These are the same people who 10 years ago advocated keeping insurance rates low on pickups and SUV's due to the safety they offered their own occupants.

These are the same people who aggresively campaigned the major players Allstate, State Farm, Nationwide, Farmers and a handful of others to keep the insurance rates higher on sports cars like the Corvette despite their much lower cost to insure ratios. The reasoning was that high performance sports cars were luxuries and could be used to offset the cost of insurance of the aging fleet of mini-pickups - many of which were riding around uninsured.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety would better serve mankind if they moved to Iraq.
Old 03-29-2008, 10:11 PM
  #13  
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Razz1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cali
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Ok, they can move to Iraq.
Old 03-30-2008, 12:17 AM
  #14  
Registered
 
fahrfegneugen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wash/Idaho
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well, thanks for that tid bit of info on the IIHS, but I think they would be better in India crashing the G-Wiz or something. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quHzOK9chx8

I still want to tell my coworker the following quote, because she always tells me I should have just bought a pick up truck. I don't know @#$ why but she does...

"Pickups are another surprisingly unsafe group of vehicles. Based on fatality-rate data, they're by far the most dangerous, says Michael Dulberger, president of the safety advocacy group Informed for Life."

Last edited by fahrfegneugen; 03-30-2008 at 12:20 AM.
Old 03-30-2008, 09:04 AM
  #15  
mwc
Registered
 
mwc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kartweb
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety is an ad-hoc agency with absolutely zero credibility.

Notice the same message in the top 20 list - no side airbags standard.

These are the same people who 10 years ago advocated keeping insurance rates low on pickups and SUV's due to the safety they offered their own occupants.

These are the same people who aggresively campaigned the major players Allstate, State Farm, Nationwide, Farmers and a handful of others to keep the insurance rates higher on sports cars like the Corvette despite their much lower cost to insure ratios. The reasoning was that high performance sports cars were luxuries and could be used to offset the cost of insurance of the aging fleet of mini-pickups - many of which were riding around uninsured.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety would better serve mankind if they moved to Iraq.
Excuse me since this off-topic from the original post (didn't read the linked article either). However, regarding the IIHS, my understanding is that it is the other way around. The IIHS is funded by the insurance companies, so it is the insurance companies who use the IIHS to campaign their causes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IIHS

Cheers
Old 03-30-2008, 09:26 AM
  #16  
Drive it like u stole it!
iTrader: (2)
 
chancejat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: mobile, al
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
this top 20 is flawed....the s2000 is on it just because it doesnt have side airbags...but it still has 5 star crash ratings....
Old 03-30-2008, 09:32 AM
  #17  
Registered
 
Georgia8er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Georgia
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It seems most of the cars on this list are cheaper cars, and the criteria for safety isn't crash results but how many airbags the vehicle has. Seems like they just needed an article and told one of the interns to whip something up fast.
Old 03-30-2008, 09:55 AM
  #18  
Registered
 
Triperformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
+1 for a gay article thats worthless in making life better and causing drama......
Old 03-30-2008, 04:17 PM
  #19  
DaveCm
 
DaveCM203's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Central North Carolina
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The statement by Toyota if full of it. I am a Toyota salesman and they never instructed us to tout the advantages of side airbags unless the vehicle has it. If it is so important to Toyota, the why was the 2008 and 2007 Corollas unavailable in the South East district. If a customer wanted side airbags in a Corolla we had order from the factory. There was none ever available from NC to FL.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
New_Mazda_Guy
NW RX-8 Forum
14
09-19-2019 11:20 AM
fourwhls
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
02-20-2019 05:16 PM
jasonrxeight
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
2
09-30-2015 01:53 PM
UnrealOne
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
2
09-30-2015 11:04 AM
XianUnix
Series I Trouble Shooting
6
09-29-2015 03:48 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 20 Most Dangerous Vehicles on the Road today.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25 PM.