Higher capacity injectors are available
Higher capacity injectors are available
I just found out from GReddy that there's a few people using RC Engineering injectors to get more fuel to their boosted 8s:
http://www.rceng.com/
They make higher-capacity injectors that plug right in to the stock fuel rail.
http://www.rceng.com/
They make higher-capacity injectors that plug right in to the stock fuel rail.
So the question is why? The stock injectors can already deliver enough fuel to reach 320 rwhp using a modified greddy turbo.
________
Coach purses
________
Coach purses
Last edited by PUR NRG; May 1, 2011 at 06:45 AM.
Originally Posted by PUR NRG
So the question is why? The stock injectors can already deliver enough fuel to reach 320 rwhp using a modified greddy turbo.
I do not believe you can safely exceed 320 rwhp without using a different turbo, fuel/timing map and lots of motor/drivetrain work. Sticking larger injectors on the Greddy kit is a solution looking for a problem.
________
Erica_Lopez
________
Erica_Lopez
Last edited by PUR NRG; May 1, 2011 at 06:45 AM.
Originally Posted by PUR NRG
I do not believe you can safely exceed 320 rwhp without using a different turbo, fuel/timing map and lots of motor/drivetrain work. Sticking larger injectors on the Greddy kit is a solution looking for a problem.
Even with Scott's turbine improvements you can not physically push more boost through the Greddy turbo than what the stock injectors can already handle. So once again, what are the benefits of using larger injectors with a Greddy turbo? Please don't tell me this is a stupid bling-bling "larger must be better" thread.
Sapphonica, if you want a safety margin then there are other components at greater risk than the injectors at those hp levels.
Nemesis8, larger injectors would require changing the entire fuel map. The ecu assumes the injectors are a given size and drives them accordingly. On the other hand I'd rather run smaller injectors at a higher duty cycle--I believe it will atomize fuel that much better.
________
SexyLexa
Sapphonica, if you want a safety margin then there are other components at greater risk than the injectors at those hp levels.
Nemesis8, larger injectors would require changing the entire fuel map. The ecu assumes the injectors are a given size and drives them accordingly. On the other hand I'd rather run smaller injectors at a higher duty cycle--I believe it will atomize fuel that much better.
________
SexyLexa
Last edited by PUR NRG; May 1, 2011 at 06:45 AM.
Originally Posted by PUR NRG
Even with Scott's turbine improvements you can not physically push more boost through the Greddy turbo than what the stock injectors can already handle. So once again, what are the benefits of using larger injectors with a Greddy turbo? Please don't tell me this is a stupid bling-bling "larger must be better" thread.
Sapphonica, if you want a safety margin then there are other components at greater risk than the injectors at those hp levels.
Nemesis8, larger injectors would require changing the entire fuel map. The ecu assumes the injectors are a given size and drives them accordingly. On the other hand I'd rather run smaller injectors at a higher duty cycle--I believe it will atomize fuel that much better.
Sapphonica, if you want a safety margin then there are other components at greater risk than the injectors at those hp levels.
Nemesis8, larger injectors would require changing the entire fuel map. The ecu assumes the injectors are a given size and drives them accordingly. On the other hand I'd rather run smaller injectors at a higher duty cycle--I believe it will atomize fuel that much better.
Originally Posted by PUR NRG
Even with Scott's turbine improvements you can not physically push more boost through the Greddy turbo than what the stock injectors can already handle. So once again, what are the benefits of using larger injectors with a Greddy turbo? Please don't tell me this is a stupid bling-bling "larger must be better" thread.
Sapphonica, if you want a safety margin then there are other components at greater risk than the injectors at those hp levels.
Nemesis8, larger injectors would require changing the entire fuel map. The ecu assumes the injectors are a given size and drives them accordingly. On the other hand I'd rather run smaller injectors at a higher duty cycle--I believe it will atomize fuel that much better.
Sapphonica, if you want a safety margin then there are other components at greater risk than the injectors at those hp levels.
Nemesis8, larger injectors would require changing the entire fuel map. The ecu assumes the injectors are a given size and drives them accordingly. On the other hand I'd rather run smaller injectors at a higher duty cycle--I believe it will atomize fuel that much better.
I've been told (haven't seen dynos but have it from a reliable source) that the STOCK GReddy turbo has a mass flow rate capacity to support > 300 WHP.
Anyway, at some point I am going to find out & I'll post results/dynos.
Originally Posted by Fanman
CFM from a turbo has nothing to do with the fuel injectors. If you have a larger turbo it will push more air through the engine. If you do not have enough fuel then you run into a lean condition. With larger injectors you open up the fuel flow & put more into the engine (if that is the impediment area).
Originally Posted by Sapphonica
I've been told (haven't seen dynos but have it from a reliable source) that the STOCK GReddy turbo has a mass flow rate capacity to support > 300 WHP.
________
BODY SCIENCE
Last edited by PUR NRG; May 1, 2011 at 06:46 AM.
I think where it comes up what we have to do & the effect of larger injectors was that the first person that pushed this car past 10 psi (manuel) wound up swapping out his fuel system. Several other knowledgeable poster on the board posted that the stock injectors were the restriction point of the fuel system, and that the stock system petered out at around 10 psi. Also that the duty cycle was 100% at 10 psi. Mazsport has pushed their Greddy past where people thought you could push a stock fuel system RX8. Interesting results. I hope somebody else can repeat these results.
In reducing the duty cycle of the injectors, you are increasing their life. I'm not sure that an injector would atomize fuel that much better if it at a higher duty cycle. Pushing fuel to the engine is pushing fuel. So an injector working at 100% vs a larger injector pushing say 80% you are still getting the same amount of fuel in the same way, no atomization or fuel breakup, or anything. I'm looking at swapping the 380's for 440's.
In reducing the duty cycle of the injectors, you are increasing their life. I'm not sure that an injector would atomize fuel that much better if it at a higher duty cycle. Pushing fuel to the engine is pushing fuel. So an injector working at 100% vs a larger injector pushing say 80% you are still getting the same amount of fuel in the same way, no atomization or fuel breakup, or anything. I'm looking at swapping the 380's for 440's.
Mazport has the potential to go higher than they have already achieved by adding larger injectors, right now they are lowering the duty cycle i high rpms for safety reasons. If they were to use larger injectors they could tune higher. My plans are to get the Interceptor-X, replace the secondaries and primary 2s with 550cc injectors and get a bigger turbo which can support more CFM. I plan on having all this by mid-October.
question for those changing injector sizes -
the stock primary injectors use a nozle that has 12? holes vs. the primary 2 and secondaries which have nozles with 4 or 6 holes. The whole point is that the primaries can atomize fuel better which aids in fuel economy at idle and low speeds.
So, what are you guys doing about this? Can you get injectors with different size nozle holes?
on a similar subject, the idle vibration i've found is caused by the injectors switching on and off at idle trying to maintain a really lean mixture. could you change the primary injector size to sort of force a richer idle mixture, therefore, smooth out the idle?
the stock primary injectors use a nozle that has 12? holes vs. the primary 2 and secondaries which have nozles with 4 or 6 holes. The whole point is that the primaries can atomize fuel better which aids in fuel economy at idle and low speeds.
So, what are you guys doing about this? Can you get injectors with different size nozle holes?
on a similar subject, the idle vibration i've found is caused by the injectors switching on and off at idle trying to maintain a really lean mixture. could you change the primary injector size to sort of force a richer idle mixture, therefore, smooth out the idle?


