The mazda's current statement of "bigger renesis engine" according to rotarynews.com .... will this engine have another rotor to UP the displacement or will the acual Bi-rotors in the current renesis be inlarged...

if they choose to enlarge the displacement using another rotor , wont that be going against the statement a mazda engineer told me (recently i attended the NYC auto show and met a drunk man who was telling me he's a mazda engineer...old guy about 50yr drinking beer...) "3 rotors fucks the balance up, thats why we havnt used it for a wile and 4 rotor is perfect...then the man stumbled away...

hmmm.....yeah just answer the 1st part :D

1 rotor side is .654cc of displacement on the renesis...

renesis 1 rotor = .654cc = 125hp
renesis 2rotor = 1.308cc = 250hp

mazda promosing over 300HP in the next rx7

renesis 3 rotor = 1.962cc = 375hp


renesis 4 rotor = 2.616cc = 550hp

hmm......
:D :D :D :D :D

does that mean 4 rotors will leave you @ 10/15 mpg too? hehe

Originally posted by RacingDynamcs
1 rotor side is .654cc of displacement on the renesis...

renesis 1 rotor = .654cc = 125hp
renesis 2rotor = 1.308cc = 250hp

mazda promosing over 300HP in the next rx7

renesis 3 rotor = 1.962cc = 375hp


renesis 4 rotor = 2.616cc = 550hp

hmm......
:D :D :D :D :D

Ummm, don't you mean 4 rotors = 500 hp? Damned multiplication:mad: :p

yeah finger slipped =) you know how it is...:D :p :o

another funny old thread i wanted to bring back to life

damn, you dug deep.

kinda funny how in 2003 someone was sking about an engine that finally came out in the news several years later.

god dayum, this thread is older than my bunnies!

Wow someone is bored digging all of this up haha

It's older than my driver's license for sure.