Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

HEY Group buy CZ1 guys!! How do you like it??

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 5, 2004 | 11:54 AM
  #1  
Velocity-8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Whuumpha!!
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
HEY Group buy CZ1 guys!! How do you like it??

I installed my Stage 1 last night and took a test drive. There seems to be a bit more power but nothing monumental. I guess after waiting 4 months my expectations kept going up.

I'll be taking my 8 to Atco Raceway soon to get documented numbers on the gains.

So how do you guys like your Stage 1??
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2004 | 12:06 PM
  #2  
SMigneco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
I feel the same way. It seems to pull harder all the way to redline but it would have been pretty hard for it to live up to our expectations considering all the hoops we went through (actually epitrochoid went through) to get it. It seems to have more power throughout the rev range. I only have about 30 minutes driving time on it so far so more time will tell.

The car is definitely more responsive than before and my exhaust seems quieter now.

I can't wait to see your numbers. Are you going to do runs with Stage 1 turned on and then turned off?
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2004 | 12:18 PM
  #3  
Velocity-8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Whuumpha!!
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Originally posted by SMigneco


I can't wait to see your numbers. Are you going to do runs with Stage 1 turned on and then turned off?
I ran the car at Atco with the exhaust only and my best was a 14.8. Here's the time slip.


Car #202
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2004 | 12:22 PM
  #4  
SMigneco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Sweet. Can't wait to see the improved (*crosses fingers/says hail mary) numbers!
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2004 | 01:07 PM
  #5  
epitrochoid's Avatar
Riot Controller
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
v8, what were your times before stage 1.1?
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2004 | 03:59 PM
  #6  
h0rde's Avatar
CVRRVS CELER
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: York PA
do you guys all have the "M" flash or have you just put the unit in regardless? My car is going in for service on tuesday and I'm going to have them reflash it to M (or punch them in the face if it comes to that, whatever) and then i'll put the canzoomer gadget in. Is anyone running their 1.1 without the latest flash?
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2004 | 04:00 PM
  #7  
Velocity-8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Whuumpha!!
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Originally posted by epitrochoid
v8, what were your times before stage 1.1?
That time slip is before the ECU. I just put it in last night silly! :D

I'll go back in about a week.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2004 | 04:39 PM
  #8  
rotaryaddict's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Allentown, PA
hey fellas, quick question: What flash are you talking about? I asked the service manager about any mods from Mazda to improve the mileage on the rx8 and he said no. I do plan on getting a CZ stage 1 or 1.1 because my mileage really sucks, literally! Thanks.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2004 | 04:43 PM
  #9  
epitrochoid's Avatar
Riot Controller
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
i installed it with K flash, it idle's rough and the high rpm isn't smooth. its fast though, I beat a z28 after 100mph from a 60mph roll
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2004 | 04:53 PM
  #10  
Velocity-8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Whuumpha!!
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
I have the "M". Maybe I should list that in my sig as a mod? :D
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2004 | 04:56 PM
  #11  
HiTMaNN's Avatar
RX-8s Official Cool Guy
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,150
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver BC
yah be "coool"
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 07:05 PM
  #12  
Shooter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte
Installed mine today...Definitely notice a difference. The rpm's rev alot faster and the engine seems to have a higher pitch whine than it did before. However, the car idles rough as hell with it installed. I thought I had M however after the rough idle I think I may have been given L instead of M. Unfortunately my work order for the recalls, etc didnt list the part number of the pcm reflash. The brake pedal test works but I suspect I got L and thats why it idles rough. Gonna give the dealer a call tomorrow and have them look up what flash I got.

Regardless, I do love the increase in power it has given. The beep comes on before you know it!
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 07:40 PM
  #13  
epitrochoid's Avatar
Riot Controller
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
does your idle start out fine and they get rough the more you drive, regardless of how hard you drive? thats how mine is....I didn't have M either
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 10:19 PM
  #14  
h0rde's Avatar
CVRRVS CELER
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: York PA
Originally posted by epitrochoid
does your idle start out fine and they get rough the more you drive, regardless of how hard you drive? thats how mine is....I didn't have M either
my car does this normally (without stage 1.1)...drive it for a bit, sit in neutral, car sort of shakes and shudders. it has done this since I bought it.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 10:36 PM
  #15  
SMigneco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
I have the M flash and 1.1. Idle is fine. Maurice had stated that the new tune was compatible with all flashes but everyone that puts it in with L flash seems to have minor problems.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 10:39 PM
  #16  
1stRX8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: Houston
i installed it with K flash, it idle's rough and the high rpm isn't smooth. its fast though, I beat a z28 after 100mph from a 60mph roll
I have the K flash. My car lost about 5-7hp with CZ1 AND ran roughly. I did about 12 or more pulls on the dyno. CZ on= rough running and about 176ish hp. Turn it off or pull it out=183ish hp smoothly.

Spoke with CZ, I was going to back-date the CZ1 with an earlier program designed for K's, ordered that an month ago. No word.

Not a particularly good performance buy. About $100 per LOST hp. For another $5,000 I could have a Honda Civic.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2004 | 07:53 AM
  #17  
Shooter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte
Epitro,

Yeah, when i first turn it on it idles perfectly fine. However once I start driving and then come to a stop it idles rough. I did notice this morning that the tach didnt bounce around as much as it did yesterday. I hope that getting a few more miles on with it will smooth out the idle. ONly time will tell....
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2004 | 08:34 AM
  #18  
Velocity-8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Whuumpha!!
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
My idle is noticeably more erratic since the CZ1. I've also noticed more power. :D
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2004 | 09:18 AM
  #19  
epitrochoid's Avatar
Riot Controller
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
it has been stated that there's a 50 mile 'learning' period for the PCM too....

1strx8 - i dont know what the story is on your car, but I'd be weary of putting so much stock into anything coming off a dyno with this car. the power was right there, especially after the 2-3 shift. i could understand if it lost several PEAK hp due to mismatched maps and flashes, but I think the total area under the curve is still greater, and that's what counts.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2004 | 12:24 PM
  #20  
Shooter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte
it has been stated that there's a 50 mile 'learning' period for the PCM too....
I have only put about 40 miles on my car since installation and it does seem to be settling down more each day. The power is definitely there and ready to be unleashed. Get outta my way, I'm coming through!
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2004 | 08:36 PM
  #21  
Ophitoxaemia's Avatar
dizzy snake pilot
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: berkeley, ca
2.3 sec 60' time? isnt that kind of dismal even for street tires? taking .3 off that should take .3 off the total, right?

james
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2004 | 09:28 PM
  #22  
1stRX8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: Houston
1strx8 - i dont know what the story is on your car, but I'd be weary of putting so much stock into anything coming off a dyno with this car. the power was right there, especially after the 2-3 shift. i could understand if it lost several PEAK hp due to mismatched maps and flashes, but I think the total area under the curve is still greater, and that's what counts.
I can post the dyno data. the AFR after 5.5k goes way lean and the hp plot indicates a major power drop - ACROSS THE BOARD.

Turn the car off, take out or disable the CZ1 and do another pull within 3 minutes. It is way smoother and makes significantly more power.

The data is on my home PC, I will post it from there. FYI I did talk to CZ, he is sending me the software to back date the CZ1 program for K flash. I hope that works.

The dyno may or may not be showing the full power output capacity. IMHO, it is very close. I would be surprised if it is making more than 220hp at the crank. My car indicates about 183ish at the wheels which sounds close at least.

It does, however, indicate changes. The CZ1 is not doing anything good right now, it does not feel faster OR measure faster.

Maurice will get it right - soon I hope.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2004 | 11:08 PM
  #23  
epitrochoid's Avatar
Riot Controller
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
yea...i dont think running an M tune on a K pcm is a good idea. that's why i pulled my unit until I can get flashed or my data cable comes and I can put the K tune back on.

but damn, to loose power being too lean means it's gotta be on the other side of stoich...that's just plain bad!
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2004 | 11:12 PM
  #24  
1stRX8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: Houston
yep.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2004 | 11:13 PM
  #25  
1stRX8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: Houston
It will be fixed just in time for the Turbo mods.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31 PM.