View Full Version : President Bush Nominated for Nobel Peace Prize


Speed-ER doc
02-13-2004, 08:46 PM
Probably won't get it though, at least not this year.....

http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/news/story.jsp?floc=NW_1-T&oldflok=FF-APO-1103&idq=/ff/story/0001%2F20040213%2F1327364311.htm&sc=1103&photoid=20040212ROM119

compaddict
02-13-2004, 08:52 PM
I searched and searched but I can't find the "onion".

I know it's around, I just know it!

Vince

jimbo912
02-13-2004, 10:42 PM
The only Peace prize bush could win is -Piece Of Crap Prize. Doc,you are just opening yourself and bush up for abuse with posts like this. Guess you enjoy it????

Speed-ER doc
02-14-2004, 12:39 AM
That was a great comeback, "piece of crap prize" LOL :)

I do like to stir things up, and I like a good laugh. Is that so wrong? I can take the abuse, and so can our great president.

Peace.

Nubo
02-14-2004, 01:43 AM
Nobel - was that the dynamite guy or the machine-gun guy? I get 'em mixed up.

Lock & Load
02-14-2004, 01:58 AM
Yasser Arafat

The worlds Biggest Terrorist was given the Novel Peace Price .

What a JOKE and an INSULT to previous NOVEL PEACE PRICE RECIPIENTS .

Compared to THIS BIT OF SCUMM GEORGE BUSH IS A SAINT and WORTHY recipient IMOH.

cheers
michael

I, Claudius
02-14-2004, 07:51 AM
So far, more than 500 American dead, and 3000 injured. I haven't seen any current data on the UK military death toll, but it's somewhere around 60. Then there are the 9000 or 10,000 Iraqi civilians who were killed during the liberation process. Sure. What the heck. He's a great president. Give him the Nobel peace prize. Hell, like Lock & Load says, give him that Novel peace prize too. (I suspect the novel it was named for is '1984.')

noahprtlnd
02-14-2004, 09:37 AM
Originally posted by I, Claudius
Hell, like Lock & Load says, give him that Novel peace prize too. (I suspect the novel it was named for is '1984.')

No, Claudius, according to Lock & Load it is the Novel Peace Price

By the way, a nomination means absolutely nothing - there's tons of people that can make a nomination.

Baller
02-16-2004, 12:47 AM
I voted for bush because, well just because....I can't think of any reason...........wait a min. he sucks

Speed-ER doc
02-16-2004, 12:48 AM
Originally posted by Baller
I voted for bush because, well just because....I can't think of any reason...........wait a min. he sucks
And HE'S supposed to be the stupid one? :)\

You sure you don't live in Florida?

Baller
02-16-2004, 09:55 AM
hey my name is bubbba, I am a friend of the baller.
He sais not to vote for Bush, but I did because Bush promised me a job in Nevada storing nuclear garbage, what a great job.
I gained all of my pounds back so i am strong again....vote for bush so i can work storing all the nations nuclear waste....hell it pays $10 a hour and my kids can do it when they be old enough,

Baller
02-16-2004, 09:59 AM
I am also a friend of the ballers...I also voted for Bush, but he kept looking at my chest....so now I vote for Dick.

Baller
02-16-2004, 10:09 AM
Bush sent me this shirt...so I must vote for him....my friend the baller said no...

Supraman
02-16-2004, 01:02 PM
Bush is a dick!!!!

RX_999
02-16-2004, 01:20 PM
Without comment or ceremony, President Bush on Tuesday signed a bill allowing a record $984 billion increase in the amount the federal government can borrow, to a record $7.4 trillion.

The increased federal borrowing will enable the government to pay for the $350 billion economic stimulus package that the GOP-led Congress passed last week at Mr. Bush's behest.

Mr. Bush will hold a signing ceremony at the White House on Wednesday to celebrate passage of that legislation, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer announced. The package includes $330 billion in tax cuts and $20 billion in aid for states.

Passage of the bill raising the nation's debt ceiling came last Friday, only hours after the tax-cut bill was approved. Congressional Democrats had sought to spotlight the federal IOUs that have resumed piling up under Mr. Bush.

But Republican leaders maneuvered to get the debt-ceiling measure passed quickly, and with little fanfare.

The Senate gave the bill final congressional approval by 53-44 on Friday.

Republican leaders did not bring the measure to the Senate floor until the House had left town for a weeklong Memorial Day recess.

The House had avoided a direct vote on the debt limit by reviving a rule that made its approval of a borrowing increase automatic when Congress finished its annual budget last month.

After running annual surpluses during the last four years of the Clinton administration, federal deficits have returned. This year's is expected to well exceed $300 billion, a record, and huge future shortfalls are expected with no end in sight.

"That is a debt tax that every taxpayer has to pay, it is a debt tax that robs this generation and future generations of the ability to make our own fiscal choices," said Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont. Said during Friday's debate.

Mr. Bush's signing of the bill — announced in a statement with a single sentence — will enable the government to borrow money until sometime next year.

The Treasury Department had warned it needed the extension by this week "to preserve the confidence in the U.S. government and to prevent uncertainty that would adversely affect our economic recovery."

Failure to extend the borrowing limit could have led to a first-ever federal default — for which neither party would want to be blamed.

The current $6.4 trillion limit was breached earlier this year, and Treasury paid its bills by shifting money from government retirement and other funds, maneuvers it said it could not make again.

By 52-47, the Senate rejected a Democratic amendment that would have limited the increase to $350 billion — the same size as the package of tax cuts and aid to states.

It would also have forced lawmakers to revisit the issue later this year, when Democrats could have used it again to focus on the government's fiscal status.

Another Democratic amendment, defeated by the same margin, would have put the Republican-controlled Senate on record as opposing any increase in the annual cost-of-living increases for Social Security recipients.

Republicans wanted to prevent Democrats from using that vote against GOP incumbents in campaign ads next year.

Speed-ER doc
02-16-2004, 01:37 PM
Let's keep it on topic, shall we?

Baller
02-16-2004, 01:40 PM
a deflating bum