noahclark1304
11-01-2003, 09:27 PM
RX-8 (http://mazda.jbcarpages.com/RX8/#reviews)
This may be on a tread but still good.
This may be on a tread but still good.
|
View Full Version : This is the best artical on the RX-8 noahclark1304 11-01-2003, 09:27 PM RX-8 (http://mazda.jbcarpages.com/RX8/#reviews) This may be on a tread but still good. Geek 11-06-2003, 11:45 PM Cool site Thks.... syntrix 11-07-2003, 12:12 AM It's ok. One Paragraph contradicts itself: But downshifting is redefined by the rotary engine, not to mention the brilliant close-ratio six-speed gearbox. You can drop the RX-8 into second gear at a speed that would cause almost every other car on the planet to scream, if not explode. A close ratio WOULD make the gearbox explode! I think they got the name "close-ratio" wrong, or got the comparison backwards. Also, they don't say how downshifting is actually "redefined" by the rotary engine. Screwy. I'd give the review 4 out of 10 stars. Less if you include their blank "mod section". BoomerBurt 11-17-2003, 09:13 PM The "close ratio" point is that there is not a large jump from gear to gear, so down-shifting at speed for stronger acceleration will not cause the rev's to jump up too high and damage things. I think it is a valid point, and a significant point for an engine with relatively low torque. No, it doesn't explain the "redefinition" thing, but I would guess that the fact that the rotary will rev quickly is what makes downshifting better than in a piston-engined car. I'm not sure I would defend this as "redefined", but it does work better. RX8FanMan 11-18-2003, 06:21 PM they have a pretty good selection in their wallpapers, why don't they have titanium? syntrix 11-18-2003, 06:25 PM Originally posted by BoomerBurt The "close ratio" point is that there is not a large jump from gear to gear, so down-shifting at speed for stronger acceleration will not cause the rev's to jump up too high and damage things. I think it is a valid point, and a significant point for an engine with relatively low torque. No, it doesn't explain the "redefinition" thing, but I would guess that the fact that the rotary will rev quickly is what makes downshifting better than in a piston-engined car. I'm not sure I would defend this as "redefined", but it does work better. There is a large jump from gear to gear. If the gear box was close ratio, you might only have to 2x clutch 1500 rpms on a downshift. If the gear box was wide/economy/etc you might have to downshift 3500 rpm per gear. IMHO the gearbox is not close-ratio. Especially if you have driven earlier cars with close ratio gear boxes. Why am I speeding on the freeway in 2nd gear? In a close ratio, I should have to be in 4th, and it would make better use of the 6 speed. I've been wondering about a higher ratio ring & pinion for a while, and I think this would be the best damn mod for the car! Omicron 11-19-2003, 08:56 AM Originally posted by syntrix I'd give the review 4 out of 10 stars. Less if you include their blank "mod section". Yeah, what's up with that? I couldn't even get into the "Submit your RX-8" section! Originally posted by BoomerBurt Why am I speeding on the freeway in 2nd gear? Because the car has a 9000 RPM redline :D |