kristopher_d
10-07-2007, 04:04 AM
I'm trying to pick a compressor for my turbo project, which means doing some math and then plotting some points. However, I've hit a snag.
Using MazdaManiac's "Rotary Math (http://www.rx8club.com/showthread.php?t=106294)" thread for guidance on the engine's characteristics, and the formulae at the end of a thread I found on turbo sizing (http://www.globalgoldtalk.com/everything-about-cars/48178-turbo-sizing-tech-finding-right-size-turbo-your-forced-induction-project.html), I'm getting some numbers that are well outside the range I expected. In fact, it's calling for PR's that are approximately triple what I would have expected. So then I decided to run the same calcs, replacing my HP goal with the 333hp the stock fuel system can support, and again, the PR from the turbo sizing article formula is about 3 times that listed in the Rotary Math thread.
The issue seems to be in the MAP calculation, where the turbo sizing thread says
MAP=[MFR * 639.6 (460 + Tin)]/VE(RPM/2)*CID.
What I found is that if I drop the 639.6 from the equation and multiply the result by 200, then the numbers start to look similar. So: MAP = [200*MFR(460+Tin)]/VE(RPM/2)CID seems to correlate approximately, but not precisely to what MazdaManiac's write up suggests.
Now, since MM's numbers are in line with what I was expecting, and he's successfully driving around with a turbo, I'm more inclined to trust them than this other thread. At this point, I'm really just wondering if I'm missing something, or if the turbo sizing thread I found is missing something.
I don't have the exact numbers, as I was doing the calcs on a desk calculator and not writing anything down. I'm just trying to ensure I understand what I'm doing in this phase before I try to use this info while looking at compressor maps.
Using MazdaManiac's "Rotary Math (http://www.rx8club.com/showthread.php?t=106294)" thread for guidance on the engine's characteristics, and the formulae at the end of a thread I found on turbo sizing (http://www.globalgoldtalk.com/everything-about-cars/48178-turbo-sizing-tech-finding-right-size-turbo-your-forced-induction-project.html), I'm getting some numbers that are well outside the range I expected. In fact, it's calling for PR's that are approximately triple what I would have expected. So then I decided to run the same calcs, replacing my HP goal with the 333hp the stock fuel system can support, and again, the PR from the turbo sizing article formula is about 3 times that listed in the Rotary Math thread.
The issue seems to be in the MAP calculation, where the turbo sizing thread says
MAP=[MFR * 639.6 (460 + Tin)]/VE(RPM/2)*CID.
What I found is that if I drop the 639.6 from the equation and multiply the result by 200, then the numbers start to look similar. So: MAP = [200*MFR(460+Tin)]/VE(RPM/2)CID seems to correlate approximately, but not precisely to what MazdaManiac's write up suggests.
Now, since MM's numbers are in line with what I was expecting, and he's successfully driving around with a turbo, I'm more inclined to trust them than this other thread. At this point, I'm really just wondering if I'm missing something, or if the turbo sizing thread I found is missing something.
I don't have the exact numbers, as I was doing the calcs on a desk calculator and not writing anything down. I'm just trying to ensure I understand what I'm doing in this phase before I try to use this info while looking at compressor maps.